you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Feldheld 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

Maybe you're an Reitschuster expert, but when I just checked it says he was removed from the press group because he said he was based in Montenegro, while that group are only for Berlin and Bonn based press.

Thats the official reason but it is obvious bullshit because many other journalists arent living in Berlin or Bonn and yet they are still members. Unlike many other members who rarely show up in person, Reitschuster was always present in person which means even though he might live abroad on paper, he actually spent most of his time in Berlin.

I wonder, in your mind, do right wing conspiracy theorists exist?

How would that be relevant?

[–]Site_rly_sux[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

obvious bullshit

Its not obvious

many other journalists

Are you pulling this out your ass?

How would that be relevant?

I don't know why you thought any of this was relevant. But seeing as you bought up how the OP publisher was calling someone a right wing conspiracist, I'd like you to make a counterargument explaining who you're talking about and why you decided Der Spiegel labeled them incorrectly.

[–]Feldheld 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Yes, it is obvious. If the Bundespressekonferenz (and many of its members including Spiegel journalists) had even the slightest interest in keeping a superficial air of freedom of press they would not have excluded the ONLY DISSIDENT JOURNALIST IN THE ROOM.

Needless to say Reitschuster was member for many years and never did anybody object to his residency in Montenegro. It was his permanent political criticism of COVID policies that made him a target, and yes it is FUCKING OBVIOUS you ridiculous tool.

[–]Site_rly_sux[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Boring whataboutism. You big baby. Are you going to cry because some moron science denialists can't hang out with the press club anymore. Give me a break you whining child. What a stupid tiny thing for you to spend so much energy on

[–]Feldheld 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Sounds like I hit the bulls eye.

[–]Airbus320 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Whine more cuck

[–]aureolin 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

what i took the point to be is sure they exist, but not everyone who is called that title fits. and it is used to group people together, then disregard them. rather than just classifying them as you seemed to mean.

but that’s just my thoughts on what feldheld meant.