Strategists admit West is goading China into war. US military experts say a war over Taiwan is desirable, because Asia’s growth to become world’s economic heartland has become unstoppable. The Western media is playing a key role in this process.

submitted by Chipit from johnmenadue.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Again you're quoting Colby, who was appointed for a short while by trump to work on the Chy-na strategy. The quotation you provide has no bearing on reality of current US policy, it's just a book by some dude related to a prior administration. That's not a personal attack on anyone.

The same idiots are in charge.

In charge of what? In charge of a fictional scenario written by a guy who used to work in the DoD for a very short while under a different government....you genuinely think, don't you, that because Friday Culture Ltd said that this is real American policy, it must be true?! Admit it. You don't need any more basis in reality than any old piece of chicom junk mail. That says a lot about you.

[–]Chipit[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

There isn't much difference between administrations. The people with real power aren't elected, and there's no way to get rid of them. Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.

You don't need any more basis in reality than any old piece of chicom junk mail. That says a lot about you.

This is a personal insult, in violation of Saidit TOS. Go back to Reddit, you don't belong here.

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Did you take that as an insult? If I mistook ChiCom propaganda constructed out of a fictional scenario written by a trump strategist as reality and somebody pointed it out, maybe I'd be upset too. Do you think maybe that's what got you upset?

It's not off topic: the first words of the title you chose to add to this post are, "strategist admits". Now we've learned that the strategist is in no position to admit anything at all, being totally outside the halls of power - are you still sure that this article is real?

[–]Chipit[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Begone, troll. Back to Reddit where you belong. You do not fit in at Saidit.

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

You do not fit in at Saidit

Did you conclude that because I have clearly been laid before, while saidit's #1 post for the past few days was the extremely virgin post titled: "Verily, I say unto thee: a WHORE is born today!"

Or is this just generally a place where we don't challenge wumao content

[–]Chipit[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

These are just more ad hominems. Back to Reddit with you.

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

No they are not ad hominems, I am legit asking you, did you proclaim that I do not fit in because of my unusually strong chad energy levels? Or because people here normally don't challenge wumao/ little pinkie propaganda? Who is that ad hominem against? Do you feel personally targeted because you never slept with a woman before, and so you strongly identified with the 'virgin' comment that wasn't about you?

[–]Chipit[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

These are insults, not arguments. Is a war desirable? Who wants it, and why?