all 63 comments

[–][deleted]  (9 children)

[deleted]

    [–]CreditKnifeMan 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

    Often times the faggot NGOs have unlimited funding and do serious shit, like organize crime and military operations.

    This.

    The real muscle behind the NWO.
    The actual deep state.

    [–][deleted]  (5 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]CreditKnifeMan 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

      The NGO foundations are the think tanks and the financing behind the real agendas.

      They plan in timelines that span centuries

      Certain goals aren't expected to be achieved within the lifetimes of the planners.

      This is matched by generational wealth.
      The Rockefeller foundation is alleged to have 30 trillion dollars in assets.

      They manipulate governments, and they're beyond the reach of most. Literally.

      The actual centers of power exert their will upon the world from within the foundations.

      Literally, the global deep state. Not at all an exaggeration.

      [–]Insider 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      This is very basic knowledge, but a lot of morons here continue to support their agenda.

      [–][deleted] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      I was just reading a BBC article mentioning the "problem of Americanization." We export our ideology through the internet now.

      [–]RedEyedWarrior 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      This is why the LGBT propaganda law exists. America has used gay rights as a weapon. But I think the Russian government should just ban all organisations that receive foreign funding.

      [–]hfxB0oyA 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

      The balls deep state.

      [–]RedEyedWarrior 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      In Russia, organisations receiving funding from abroad have to register as "foreign agents". I say just ban them completely.

      [–][deleted] 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

      Based Putin. Sometimes I think I'd be much better off in Russia than in Communist Canuckistan.

      [–]RandumbZer0 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

      No one cares about the natural born homosexuals, its the pedos, trannies & rest of thee assumed 'Initialism Lot' mucking everything up for everyone.

      The homos in my life are beyond pissed off that their cause has seemingly been hijacked by the pseudo 'woke' mob treating it like some sort of propaganda to be exploited!?

      [–][deleted]  (1 child)

      [deleted]

        [–]RandumbZer0 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        Mental Illness & Insecurity opened the door for TQIA+ when just being 'Gay' seemingly wasn't good enough for some, the LGBs are simply living as they were born.

        Remember kids, DNA never lies & just because you can put a Lambo body on a Fiero frame, doesn't make it a real Lambo.

        [–][deleted]  (8 children)

        [deleted]

          [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

          I disagree with the ban on promoting childless lifestyles

          Russia has, like, 3.2 people per square mile or something LOL. You need people.

          [–][deleted]  (1 child)

          [deleted]

            [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

            What's crazy to me is how the Russian people manage to maintain a culture and a language across that entire expanse.

            [–]Alienhunter 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

            Also has one of the lowest birthrates in the world as well.

            [–]RedEyedWarrior 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

            Russian families can have 5 children per family. That way if one of the children ends up gay as an adult, the other four kids will have five kids each, resulting in 20 grandchildren and thus population growth regardless if gay people exist.

            [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

            you are now breathing manually

            [–]Gaslov 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

            How many vacation days do you get?

            [–]Newzok 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

            If it's like the rest of Europe, it's likely five weeks a year, give or take.

            [–]Tarrock 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

            [–]d3lta105 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

            This is just more speech control.

            [–]Airbus320 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

            Or nigger control

            [–]LouisXIV 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

            Based. IMHO. Based.

            [–]RedEyedWarrior 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (34 children)

            The lawmakers note that the prohibition of LGBT propaganda does not deprive Russian citizens of the opportunity and right to determine their sexual preference and orientation, nor does it allow for their discrimination in any way.

            I hope that’s true. Personally, as a gay man, I just want to be left alone and not be bothered by LGBT activists or people seeking to change my orientation. If a gay man living in Russia can still be gay and be in a same sex relationship after this bill is passed, then I’m indifferent towards the legislation.

            Of course, this is Russia. So there is a real possibility that this law would be selectively enforced even if this bill does get passed.

            [–]Alienhunter 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

            Slippery slope works both ways unfortunately if you've not got your footing. First it's laws like this. Next they will crack down on places where homosexuals gather such as gay bars for some reason ostensibly to stop western propoganda or spies or something. Doubt they'll see much reason to police bedrooms but hey, if it's criminalized you can always use it against your political opponents and if it's demonized they'll get away with it.

            Happened to a Republican sheriff in the US even while being completely legal. Guy was well liked until it came out he had a Mexican boyfriend. After that career over. Expect opposition leaders in Russia to be "caught with their pants down" whenever a reason for their removal needs to be manufactured.

            [–]RedEyedWarrior 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

            That's a good point. It sucks for that sheriff in Arizona too. He didn't get much sympathy from liberals either. As for this bill in Russia, what are the odds of it getting passed? A bill was proposed in 2016 that would have made it illegal for gay men to come out as gay in government buildings, but the Russian parliament rejected it.

            [–]H3v8 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

            Guy was well liked until it came out he had a Mexican boyfriend.

            Was he in Texas illegally?

            [–]NuclearBadger 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (30 children)

            But why are you gay? You're literally flushing your entire bloodline down the toilet.

            Every single one of your ancestors was straight and now you think you're some fruity fag because reasons.

            [–]JoeyJoeJoe 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

            Actually there is a solid hypothesis for homosexuality from an evolutionary perspective. Uncles & aunts who are unburdened with kids of their own contribute MASSIVELY to the survival of the tribe.

            [–]Newzok 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

            Considering the subcultures around specific types of men I see no reason to think it's otherwise. Why would a vast amount of dudes be attracted to guys with specific traits(like bears, for instance) that are not considered conventionally attractive? It's certainly not a random misfire nor a social trend. It's innate.

            [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

            A lot of women prefer a big, burly guy.

            [–]NuclearBadger 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

            You can be childless and just not be interested in women. That doesn't mean you have to go and shag other men.

            Being gay increases dramatically with overcrowding.

            [–]Vulptex 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

            That flatly contradicts your first argument

            [–]NuclearBadger 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

            I was talking about in "tribes" it's the alpha that gets the women and has the children.

            But you don't see a bunch of monkeys gangbanging each other because they can't get the girl. They do the boring stuff because the alpha should take the first death, then a leader steps in.

            Overcrowding and loss of purpose leads to homos. People in cities are at a massive disadvantage mentally.

            [–]Vulptex 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

            Straight incels aren't going to bang other males because they can't get a girl.

            [–]Vulptex 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

            But why does a bloodline even matter? Why should you be beholden to the actions of your ancestors?

            [–]NuclearBadger 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

            Because they survived everything the world could throw at them.

            And you, after millions of years of fighting to stay alive just went "nope".

            What a fucking waste.

            [–]Vulptex 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

            They're all dead so evidently they didn't survive. Not that that's a bad thing in this world, just make sure you don't get tricked into reincarnating or anything.

            And they all fought to keep themselves alive. They had no idea who I am.

            [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

            They're homosexual because "nature" has determined that this is the end of the line for this genetic makeup. It is too defective to keep reproducing it, so it is being made homosexual. The fauna has the same mechanism.

            [–]RedEyedWarrior 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (18 children)

            I dunno why. I just am.

            Besides, I have a sister and a brother. They can reproduce.

            [–]Newzok 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (15 children)

            Pretty much this. It's not exactly fun to find out you're gay and it's not something any of us chooses. You realise that - oh shit- it's not because you're a late developer that you don't find girls interesting; you just got a crush on your male friend/teacher/whatever. Or some variation of that. Years of denial, trying to be straight. But try as you might, ladies just never get your dick up. Meanwhile, feel like a total outcast because all you've seen of gay people in media is mincing queens and you're not like that.

            I swear, that type of representation is the fucking worst and I resent the camp gay stereotype over all the damage it's done.

            /rant

            [–]Alienhunter 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

            Think of the type of people who actually want to go to Hollywood and it makes sense why the representation is like that I think.

            Personally I think the reasons why you've got the stereotypes that all gay people are sexual predators and pedophiles is simply because for the normal person who isn't gay, their only real known interactions with gay people are going to be when someone does something bad to them or someone they know.

            I don't really think the kind of "don't ask don't tell" mentality of completely shoving it under the rug is very healthy for our society for that reason. Gay people shouldn't face firings or any real social ostracization merely for it being known that they are gay. Much beyond that though I think the kind of displays you see at pride parades and the like need to basically stay in 18+ age restricted zones far away from where children can see it.

            Like I think for teenagers there comes a point where you need to say, look some people are gay and that's how it is to help keep them away from the depressive help me I'm not normal cycles. But I think it's also important we don't expose people to the degenerate side of the coin either cause as you say, if kids get this idea that gays are all these weirdo sexual deviants you see at the pride parade they are either not going to understand what is going on and think they are gay because they like the bright colors and weird costumes or they are going to hate themselves for being gay because they don't want to be like that and they think that's what being gay means. It's fucked up for everyone.

            [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

            Personally I think the reasons why you've got the stereotypes that all gay people are sexual predators and pedophiles is simply because for the normal person who isn't gay, their only real known interactions with gay people are going to be when someone does something bad to them or someone they know.

            Doesn't help when the founder of your movement marches with NAMBLA.

            [–]Alienhunter 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

            Here's the real question. Why didn't they kick him the fuck out?

            Gay people can complain about the stereotypes that all gay people are pedophiles all they want, I think it's not true, but if they aren't willing to call out and distance themselves from the actual pedophiles they won't be winning any public opinion battles.

            I've long warned of social backlash to gay marriage if it's pushed too fast and done by non-democratic means. Took longer than I expected but it's happening slowly but surely and I don't think it's going to abate any time soon.

            The problem with the gay rights movement is the same problem with most leftist movements, they are way too amiable and nice to people and don't kick out the people they should be. They're blinded by this kind of us vs them mentality of the Anakin Skywalker school of debate. If you're not with me than you are my enemy. Their actual enemies are on their side of the camp completely undetected while they spend their time making new enemies from the right. Soon they'll be caught in the middle If they aren't already.

            [–]RedEyedWarrior 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

            You're right. This is why I have no sympathy when laws like the one in Russia get passed. Because we don't monitor our own behaviour within the gay community. It's like a war; when soldiers on your side are incompetent, you discipline them. When they break rules, you punish them. When they commit treason, you execute them. Otherwise your side loses the war. But for some reason, most gay people who aren't perverted or sociopathic are pussies. So the gay rights movement makes us look bad because we let the bad apples do what they want.

            [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

            The problem with the gay rights movement is the same problem with most leftist movements, they are way too amiable and nice to people

            I don't think that's it.

            [–]Alienhunter 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

            Should be specified, these are offline people, they're nice to people irl and people in their ingroup they don't have tagged as enemies. Far too inclusive.

            [–]RedEyedWarrior 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

            NAMBLA should not be allowed to exist at all. The age of consent exists because children cannot process sexual attractions.

            [–]RedEyedWarrior 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

            Well said. Society needs to acknowledge that gay people exist and help gay teenagers accept themselves without promoting degeneracy or giving gay people special treatment.

            [–]RedEyedWarrior 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

            You've just described by adolescence. I had same sex attractions since I was 14, but I was almost 18 when I finally acknowledged I was gay. I believed there was no way I could be gay because I wasn't camp or effeminate. But I had zero interest in women. I befriended a girl when I was 16 and my family and friends joked about her being my girlfriend, which made me extremely comfortable for some reason. I assumed it was just because I was a late bloomer, or that my friend wasn't my type. After all, I had male friends who I wasn't attracted to, right? But I wasn't attracted to any of the girls at my school, but some of the boys. It became obvious to me that I liked males at 17, but it took months for me to acknowledge I had no interest in women.

            Ironically, I am more masculine now than I was as a teenager. I do not mind camp gay characters on TV and film, but it does bother me whenever all of the gay characters are camp. Who says we have to be camp? I probably would have realised I was gay sooner if I'd seen masculine gay men on TV.

            [–]Newzok 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

            Very similar to me, bro. I didn't even like guys my age but way older bearish guys. They never mentioned that stuff in sex ed, so it was very confusing. No role models, nothing. I came out to myself at age 18, realising I'd made myself miserable and paranoid beating myself up about it for the last five years. It was like a weight off my shoulders.

            Campness is a relic from earlier days when it might have been the only way to communicate to others in the know and you needed cultural signifiers. Interpersonally I don't mind it, it's like being "street" in a sense. But it's without doubt an affectation; it's really counterproductive that people think it's an innate characteristic of being gay. As if we're something halfway to trannies, you know? Which is really the complete opposite.

            [–]RedEyedWarrior 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

            I'd say the majority of gay men are masculine. You see the camp ones more often because they cannot hide their orientations, whereas masculine gay men don't show it unless they do so on purpose. I also had no gay role models, so I make do with the straight role models in my life, such as my dad, uncles and cousins. The idea that a gay man has to be camp is absurd.

            [–]Gaslov 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

            You don't find out you're gay. You aren't born with a predefined sexuality. Not only is there nothing in the genome to indicate homosexuality, people often become gay after trauma. I personally know someone who's 13 year old decided she's gay after a bad breakup with her boyfriend. And being enabled by her parents and social group probably means she'll be convinced she was born that way, long after forgetting the initial trauma that took her down this path.

            Also, homosexuals are 7 times more likely to report sexual molestation in asolescense than their straight counterparts.

            The born that way lie is such a massive fraud on the well meaning.

            [–]Newzok 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

            You don't find out you're gay

            Wtf yes you do. Every gay you'll ask will have a similar story. Anywhoo I had a pretty decent middle class childhood with no trauma, still turned out that way. I'm the youngest brother, maybe that's a factor. I've tried getting with females, man. It doesn't make any sparks fly. Trust me, it's just how I'm wired.

            What teenage girls do should always be taken with a pinch of salt, she's probably just bisexual or acting out. But if she's truly a lesbian, be nice. At least she didn't latch onto the trans thing, which IMO is an acquired state for girls in that age range.

            [–]Gaslov 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

            I don't doubt that vanilla sex wasn't exciting. But you weren't born that way. So you didn't experience mutual attraction, so what? Not a lot of people do. So you decided to get off on perversion instead. You guys are like drug addicts, willing to claim whatever you need to to keep getting what you want. Imagine drug addicts claiming they're born that way and demanding protections.

            [–]Newzok 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

            There's not really any arguing with you, but that's OK. I've stated my experience. I've got a bf, that's all I need and it feels right to me. Luck to you, brother.

            [–]Alienhunter 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

            Aren't you afraid that they'll catch the gae from all the gaydiation you emit? Your sister might start liking musicals and dance numbers and fashion. Very dangerous.

            Make sure your tight pants are lead lined.

            [–]RedEyedWarrior 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

            I don't wear tight pants. They're ridiculous on men. 🤣🤣🤣

            Also, musicals don't interest me. I'd rather watch Revenge of the Cis.

            [–]Brewdabier 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

            And the problem is ?.

            [–]awdrifter 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

            Based.

            [–]Vulptex 2 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

            Wait a minute. Since when did Russia care about "family values"? That's Ukraine.

            [–]IMissPorn 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

            The article mentions that this proposal doesn't come from the ruling party. I don't know much about Russian politics, but I would assume this means it doesn't really have a high chance of going anywhere.

            [–]RedEyedWarrior 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

            It might and it might not be passed. The ruling party is moderate and likely won't pass this bill, seeing the current law as enough. The parliament could still pass a blanket ban on NGOs regardless of their ideology to protect the Russian Federation from American subversion.

            [–][deleted]  (2 children)

            [deleted]

              [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

              FACING doesn't mean done deal. Spek engrish?

              [–]HPFL 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

              More Western imperialist xenophobia designed to distract from their own eugenics against Gay people going on right now. Why should Russia allow propaganda telling children to cut off their genitals?