Israel approves plan to double settler population in Golan Heights

submitted by ShalomEveryone from france24.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]dingoatemytaco 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

The Israeli government later abandoned its initial position, acknowledging Israel had struck first, claiming that it was a preemptive strike in the face of a planned invasion by Egypt. On the other hand, the Arab view was that it was unjustified to attack Egypt. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Six-Day_War

Article 49 of the Fourth Geneva Convention states: “The Occupying Power shall not deport or transfer parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies.” ... https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/campaigns/2019/01/chapter-3-israeli-settlements-and-international-law/

[–]ShalomEveryone[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

In April 1967, Syria shot at an Israeli tractor ploughing in the demilitarized zone -which Syria considered an ongoing practice of Israeli encroachment on contested land. The event occasioned an escalation into a prewar aerial clash. In May 1967, following misinformation about Israeli intentions provided by the Soviet Union, Egypt expelled UN peacekeepers who had been stationed in the Sinai Peninsula since the Suez conflict,[1] and announced a blockade of Israel's access to the Red Sea (international waters) via the Straits of Tiran, which Israel considered an act of war. Tension escalated, with both sides' armies mobilising. Less than a month later, Israel launched a surprise strike which began the Six-Day War.

Syria, along with Egypt started the war.

Article 49 of the Fourth Geneva Convention states: “The Occupying Power shall not deport or transfer parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies.”

Syria should take their grievance to the UN if they want their land back so bad.

Shalom

✡️️

[–]dingoatemytaco 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

[dubious – discuss]

Earlier in the week, Syria had twice attacked an Israeli tractor working in the DMZ area. When the tractor returned on the morning of April 7, 1967, as predicted in the plan, the Syrians opened fire again initially with light weapons. The Israelis responded by sending in armor-plated tractors to continue ploughing, resulting in further exchanges of fire. The resulting tit-for-tat escalated, leading to tanks, heavy mortars, machine guns, and artillery[dubious – discuss]

[Dubious = statement not proven. Some dudes firing small arms at a tractor is not 'Syria govenment". Not an act of war. Tractor prohibited in DMZ. Israel tractors = aggression into the DMZ.]

[–]ShalomEveryone[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You're only dismissing what I posted because it goes against the narrative you want to portray. I liked how you glossed over the Syrian government announcing a blockade against Israel, blocking Israel's access to the Red Sea. Blockades are an act of war. The Syrian government was known to use and back guerilla groups that attacked Israel and Israelis.

Shalom

✡️️