THE World Health Organisation (WHO) has been accused of being "sexist and paternalistic" by suggesting women of childbearing age should not drink alcohol.

submitted by Chipit from express.co.uk

all 15 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–][deleted]  (3 children)

[deleted]

    [–]NeedMoreCoffee 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

    Are you ok mate?

    Because this article is not about bad mothers. It's about the fact that the WHO thinks women between 15 and 45 should not be allowed to drink because they would not be as effective as broodmares while having no such advice for blokes. Hence the "sexist and paternalistic" part.

    [–]AngusMacCuckywuck 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

    shooting out babies as fast as possible to be wageslaves and war-fodder is more important than making sure half the kids don't come out retarded, deformed and/or traumatized.

    Yes, goyim, don't reproduce! White people having children are actually helping ZOG and so you are standing up to ZOG by maintaining below-replacement fertility. Save the White race through demographic genocide! Good goy!

    [–]Airbus320 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

    Its socks

    [–][deleted] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (5 children)

    Now, now.. let's not be sexist. The WHO is ignoring the menfolk here, and sperm quality contributes to healthy, not-fucked-up babies too.

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25277121/

    I guess they could force prohibition, since that turned out so incredibly well before.

    [–]Airbus320 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (2 children)

    I am so happy that I don't drink

    [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

    That's probably good, although having alcohol like once in a blue moon when you're not doing the do unprotected probably wouldn't hurt if you did. At minimum, you'll know your sperm aren't doing cartwheels into one another like a bunch of retarded frat boys from alcohol though.

    [–]Airbus320 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

    😂

    [–]Chipit[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    First that's whataboutism, second nobody accuses them of misandry. In fact my spell checker still insists that's a misspelling.

    [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    I mean, if you have links showing examples of the WHO wanting to bring attention to the limitation of a substance by men of sperm-bearing(?) years, we can talk about misandry. It's available for me with predictive text, so I don't know. Maybe the company that made the device you're using is cucked.

    https://www.who.int/news-room/events/detail/2021/06/22/default-calendar/third-who-forum-on-alcohol-drugs-and-addictive-behaviours-(fadab)

    This is the link to the forum held, but it was by invitation only. I can't crank out the effort right this minute to try to find the actual discussion that they had, but this warrants an actual examination of that vs what this article is talking about. These fucking media companies will do whatever it takes for clicks, so framing a title in a way that makes the audience guffaw in butt rage is going to get them what they want.

    [–]NeedMoreCoffee 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

    Obvious thing is obvious.

    [–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

    Meanwhile they're actually being "paternalistic" by pushing that we all get vaccinated, including women of childbearing age.

    [–]FlippyKing 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    If anything these accusations, which are kinda clearly true I mean It's really puritanical, are a cover for the demonstrable fact that they are just corrupt as fuck. There really is not a major institution nor a minor one that dreams of joining the big leagues that isn't corrupt now.

    [–]hfxB0oyA 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Well, by all means let 'em be liberated. Just don't come crying to this paternalistic sexist male afterward for tax supported funding to help raise your retarded fetal alcohol syndrome baby.

    [–]bluetinfoilhat 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    This thread misses the point. They are telling all women under 40 who AREN'T pregnant that they shouldn't drink. They aren't naturally saying pregnant women shouldn't drink which is known by everyone.

    [–]Chipit[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Are you saying WHO is corrupt and shouldn't be trusted? Who are you, Donald Trump?