Prince Philip has died aged 99, Buckingham Palace announces
submitted 2 years ago by StrategicTactic from (bbc.com)
view the rest of the comments →
[–]TheBeefBenson 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 2 years ago (9 children)
Firstly, I've had at least two people saying they are now so...
Secondly, which moronic beliefs are those?
Thirdly, we're in a thread talking about the British monarchy in particular. Though you may have been talking about Royalty in general, it's pretty important to bring up the fact the Britain has a constitutional monarchy, and is thus in no way a tyranny. So you can can have Royalty separate from the concept of tyranny.
[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun - 2 years ago* (8 children)
Learn some stuff: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nepotism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aristocracy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gentry https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elitism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hereditary_government https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iron_law_of_oligarchy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kakistocracy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kleptocracy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monarchism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nobility https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Old_money https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oligarchy https://infogalactic.com/info/Pedophocracy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tanistry https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timocracy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tyranny
[–]TheBeefBenson 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 2 years ago (7 children)
That does not a cohesive argument make.
[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun - 2 years ago (6 children)
Okay Yoda. Get back to me when some knowledge you have.
[–]TheBeefBenson 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 2 years ago (2 children)
But you're not even presenting an argument. You keep making random accusations about the British monarchy bring a tyranny all of which I have debunked. Then you spam me with over a dozen links and claim I need to "educate myself" in an effort to make it seem like you know what the hell you're talking about when you clearly don't.
[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun - 2 years ago (1 child)
If you can't see Western tyranny, of which they certainly play a role, I can't help you. You've debunked nothing.
[–]TheBeefBenson 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 2 years ago (0 children)
What?
The only two claims of specific tyranny you made; the crown having land in its name (which still falls under government control) and this bizzarevaccusation of Trudeau "keeping their secrets" (which is totally nonsensical) I pointed out were wrong.
Spamming links and telling me to "educate myself" with out providing an argument is painfully reminiscent of the woke mob yet again.
I have already debunked all your claims that the British Monarchy is any way a tyranny. It is a constitutional monarchy. You simply repeating these claims is not an argument.
You sound like shill timesuck socks.
I don't understand what any of that meant.
use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. sub:pics site:imgur.com dog
sub:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~0 users here now
view the rest of the comments →
[–]TheBeefBenson 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (9 children)
[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun - (8 children)
[–]TheBeefBenson 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (7 children)
[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun - (6 children)
[–]TheBeefBenson 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (2 children)
[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun - (1 child)
[–]TheBeefBenson 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–]TheBeefBenson 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (2 children)
[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun - (1 child)
[–]TheBeefBenson 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)