Prince Philip has died aged 99, Buckingham Palace announces

submitted by StrategicTactic from bbc.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]LarrySwinger2 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (14 children)

I do not.

[–]TheBeefBenson 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (13 children)

Well you'll find yourself in the minority there. Because it's quite clear humanity is quickly reaching unsustainable population levels. Furthermore we are destroying the natural habitat of almost every wild species to do so.

May I ask where you stand on the political compass, or which political group you align yourself with?

[–]JasonCarswell 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (6 children)

The "unsustainability" is through THEIR rigged systems of control. The want full spectrum dominance over every aspect of our lives while they're free to pillage and rape the Earth and its citizens.

YES, environments are being destroyed by THEIR systems. Meanwhile they're distracting us from addressing real toxic and eco issues with their bullshit Climate Change Scam for Carbon Credits - and more control that will only hurt the poorest people and the poorest nations.

It shouldn't matter what your politics are if you can see through their scams - like this absurd lockdown. (Quarantine the sick and the weak, everything else is tyranny.)

[–]TheBeefBenson 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Ok.

Back to the original problem. What do you propose to do about over population?

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

It's not a problem.

What we need to do it fight the ruling class and their rigged systems, not each other. All the chaos has been socially engineered division to distract and manufacture consent.

We need to find, develop, and share resilient decentralized alternatives and solutions to their rigged systems.

[–]TheBeefBenson 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

It's not a problem.

It literally is though.

What we need to do it fight the ruling class and their rigged systems, not each other. All the chaos has been socially engineered division to distract and manufacture consent.

We need to find, develop, and share resilient decentralized alternatives and solutions to their rigged systems.

over population will still be a problem after you have achieved this.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Over population would not be a problem with proper administration and healthy communities. So, Jason is right. Once parasitic people are taken out of power, solutions can actually be presented and acted out.

I agree, the environment is getting one hell of a beating, but that is coming more from over-consumption and waste, these things being born from poor administration and malfeasance. Proper administration and healthy communities would solve most of these "over-population" problems.

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

^ This!

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

It literally is though.

Only if you believe the propaganda from the corporatocracy, proven liars time after time after time after time after time after time after time after time after time.

They centralize everything for better control - including their overpopulated cities. Return people to manage their own land and smaller towns.

Just as they create propaganda and nonsense issues and chaos, they've also created our consumer culture. An authentic life with purpose and meaning divorced from their manufactured bullshit is what's necessary.

[–]Bigs 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

How does that alter if the world is over-populated?

[–]TheBeefBenson 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

You mean the damage to the natural environment?

[–]Bigs 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

We're not aliens; we're natural to THIS environment. This is our planet too.

My question is what does someone's political leaning have to do with your claims of megadeath or wotnot?

[–]TheBeefBenson 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

We're not aliens; we're natural to THIS environment. This is our planet too.

Yes, but we need to learn to share it.

As to the person's political stance I was just curious.

[–]LarrySwinger2 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

So the only problem is that we need to learn to share the planet? That'd mean it's a matter of organizing ourselves differently, rather than inherent, meaning the world is not overpopulated. Do you agree?

My political stance cannot be captured in a spectrum and there's no group I align myself with.

[–]TheBeefBenson 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So the only problem is that we need to learn to share the planet?

No. I never said that. One of our problems is a failure to protect the environment from the effects of human overpopulation. That's all I said.

That'd mean it's a matter of organizing ourselves differently, rather than inherent, meaning the world is not overpopulated.

What? Why would that mean the world isn't over populated? Even if we "organise ourselves differently", it doesn't magically change the fact that there are already too many people on the planet. I don't follow your reasoning here at all.

My political stance cannot be captured in a spectrum and there's no group I align myself with.

I suggest taking the 4 axis test: https://www.idrlabs.com/4-axes/test.php