all 5 comments

[–]jet199 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Interestingly this is the same argument being made by Western trans activists about why children should be allowed to transition.

Women are oppressed because they can have babies therefore if you remove their ability to reproduce you can't say it's a bad thing because you are removing their oppression. Only evil religious conservatives who want women to be baby making machines can disagree.

[–]RatherSmallPotato 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Checkmate

[–]Nandefillz 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Can I see some kind of article or other citation saying women are oppressed because of their ability to give birth?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I haven't seen that as a justification for trans stuff, but it is a broader point: feminism is a weapon levied against Western (i.e. White) countries by our racial rivals.

[–]H3v8 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Turkic populations would go the other way round, steal the children and kill the parents.