"These vaccines are unlikely to COMPLETELY STERILIZE a population, likely to have an effect of 60-70%." - Chairman of Bill Gates Global Health advisory board

submitted by Orangutan from (twitter.com)

all 23 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]LarrySwinger2 12 insightful - 7 fun12 insightful - 6 fun13 insightful - 7 fun -  (14 children)

He's talking about sterilizing immunity, i.e. that people get protected from the virus.

[–]Penelope 11 insightful - 3 fun11 insightful - 2 fun12 insightful - 3 fun -  (6 children)

Why did he use such a strange choice of words? I've never heard anyone, including medical people call immunity against something as being "sterilized" against it.

And if your interpretation is correct, 60-70% immunity sterilization is significantly below what the pharmaceutical mega corporation is claiming.

[–]LarrySwinger2 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Yes, but it makes sense in that context. I just got this from the comments on Twitter, by the way, and I'm basing my conclusion on the fact that sterilizing immunity is a real thing. The way he says it without thinking about how it comes across gives me the impression that he's studied it so long, he's unaware that the laypeople don't realize what sterilization means in this context. It's also important to note the etymology of sterilize. It originally referred to a general destruction of fertility. I'm not sure if it'd make sense to talk about rendering a virus "infertile". But one definition that does make sense in this context is to render something free of micro-organisms.

And another thing. In the Twitter cut, it looks like the interviewer has an "uh oh" moment, interrupting the scientist because he's saying more than he's supposed to. However, in the full interview it becomes clear that he was wrapping up the interview, then realized Bell was still talking, and he apologizes for cutting him off. There's nothing strange going on here.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'm not sure if it'd make sense to talk about rendering a virus "infertile". But one definition that does make sense in this context is to render something free of micro-organisms.

A) viruses do not sexually reproduce

B) viruses are not alive

C) viruses are not microorganisms

[–]truilt 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

"Immunity due to neutralizing antibodies is also known as sterilizing immunity, as the immune system eliminates the infectious particle before any infection takes place"

source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutralizing_antibody

also: https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/sterilizing-immunity

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Bill Gates has never been a fully lucid speaker. He has always sounded like he was using the wrong phrases. He thinks weirdly. He sent billions of dollars to help Africans progress and multiply, while the US has increasing poverty at home. He's weird.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Bill Gates has never been a fully lucid speaker. He has always sounded like he was using the wrong phrases.

Gates is a psychopath.

Human misery brings a smile to his face. He can't hold it back.

Have You Seen Anyone Happier? (0:18)

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

That's Beavis and Butthead level of glee. Damn.

[–]Penelope 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

Additionally, consulting a search engine has yielded zero results referring to immunity as sterilization, or "sterilizing immunity". So this guy is the first person to ever call immunity by this name. Not saying it isn't but you are acting like you know this for certain.

It doesn't help that he's sponsored by a well known eugenicist who advocates for sterilization either. Who I might also add has been caught doing questionable things with vaccines in third world nations.

Please present something credible that indicates that immunity and sterilization are interchangeable words.

[–]LarrySwinger2 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Here's a Quora question about this from 2016. It turned up immediately when I looked it up.

[–]ballooon 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

There are many results. Here is a ScienceDirect link

[–]FrenchiePup 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This does not make any sense.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

He's talking about sterilizing immunity, i.e. that people get protected from the virus.

Protection from a virus that's so deadly you have to get tested to know you have it?

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Do you have a source for the beneficial aspects of "sterilizing immunity".

This isn't the be first time I've heard of sterilizing vaccines.

The Catholic Church in opposition to the tetanus vaccine saying it as a population control tool

A row that now threatens to derail the government’s ongoing tetanus vaccination. The Catholic Church has stepped up its opposition to the exercise dismissing it as a population control tool. Doctors allied to the Catholic Church in Kenya are now warning women of reproductive age against taking the vaccine saying it could render them sterile. Or could it

[–][deleted]  (2 children)

[deleted]

    [–]Tom_Bombadil 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    The vaccine will be the real pandemic.

    This

    [–]HiddenFox 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    Hehehe take your mark.... my old man used to rant about this prophecy.... he's not sounding so crazy now..

    [–]ChillyChili 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    I'm torn. He said the words too fluidly. If it were a false statement, he should've caught himself immediately.

    That said, if you replaced that with "immunity" it might make sense???

    Did he reply to any comments on his statement or misstatement? If so, what makes more sense statistically?

    We can't just accept whatever, folks. You do that and the misinfo or intentional disinfo makes you look like stupid assholes. Think critically where others don't.

    [–]zyxzevn 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

    The health risks are explained in this video. Health Expert: “Stop COVID Vax Experiments” [TheHighwire]

    A part of the SARS-Cov2 virus has similar genetic ID as the gene that is responsible for the development of the uterus. If the vaccine uses that ID in the anti-bodies, the vaccine will sterilize women.

    [–]Rah 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    He used the exact word that brings up light to the whole scheme.

    [–]MadLass 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    Sounds like someone just finished watching Utopia!

    edit: because of the title lol

    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Hahaha Utopia was so meta, I actually enjoyed it. I like to watch futuristic shows and series for the predictive programming and symbolism because once you’re looking for it, it’s just a pattern. It’s fun to do.

    Then one day I tried Utopia and I’m literally watching a show about people who read a comic for it’s predictive programming and the symbolism within it relating to conspiracies and things that actually happen in their reality. And then I also notice the symbolism within Utopia itself.

    [–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    The "muh vaccines will sterilize" conspiracy is a massive anti conspiracy theory campaign designed to discredit anyone who is against the vaccine. It exists to discredit not only everyone who makes that claim but also everyone who has any doubts about the safety of the vaccine. The vast majority of people are too stupid to tell the difference.

    First off if it were to come to pass it would instantly cause a massive uprising against the elite by everyone who is now perfectly healthy but unable to have kids, and thus nothing left to lose. It would also leave zero deniability.

    That does not mean that the vaccine is safe. It will harm you in ways that you simply can't link to the vaccine. It will harm you in ways that will make your eventual symptoms explainable in other ways. For example the vaccine can make you vulnerable to other diseases. They can then select who will become susceptible and who wont by controlling the administration of the vaccines. However, you won't have any symptoms until you are hit with whatever you have been made vulnerable to. And then it is that secondary infection that will be solely blamed for your demise.

    [–][deleted] 0 insightful - 2 fun0 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    Slaves so obedient they undergo sterilization on command are valuable. Sterilizing them before the unification makes no sense. Unless the Illuminati are 'secretly' pro enlightenment.