all 15 comments

[–]starblue 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

And this is why the death penalty should exist. Whomever it was who perpetrated this attack has shown that they are broken and are willing to murder innocent people in cold blood. Remove from them the possibility to ever do this to someone ever again.

[–]adultmanhwa 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

to think about it, death penalty is reactionary kind of prevention. I mean, why not ban Islam? it's clear they have an ambition to kill all infidels before they say and believe syahada?

[–]adultmanhwa 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

and I'm not hateful, I'm stating what they believed in.

[–]Fuckyoucensorship 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Seeing as the only language they understand is violence I'd say this is the beast option.

They are like rapid dogs. They couldn't stop even if their life was in danger or on the verge of death.

Ban them. Deport them. Problem solved.

[–]starblue 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

In that sense, I agree with you. This is something I've been thinking about. It's like there are "levels" of civilization people are able to handle.

Those who are at a radical Islam level only understand violence and death. They need a tyrannical dictator to keep them in check because they tend to destroy and bomb wherever they go and ruin society. In that sense, the dictatorships of the ME make perfect sense.

Radical Communists fit into that same category. They believe violence is the same as words and they like the brown-shirt method of negotiation. They only understand violence and act that way.

Then you have people who need a mommy-state as adults because life is too hard. Socialist societies work for them because they like the a safety net, but they don't get to keep much money (if they earn any). Europe is mostly like this. Full democracies operate this way as the people will vote themselves money.

Then there are those fully civilized in freedom and liberty, who take responsibility for themselves and their immediate neighbors and surroundings, who live by the idea of personal responsibility and local control. They understand liberty and will be the least violent people you cross. These people function best in a full republic with liberty as the base - which was what the US was for the first 75 -100 years (we've lost a lot of it sense then). They can handle a self correcting society and the morality that is required in order to maintain it. Mixing these types does not work well.

It's just a hypothesis I've been killing over for years, but that's where I have it now.

[–]flugegeheimen 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

And this is why the death penalty should exist.

Yes, let's fuck up the judicial system for everyone to "punish" brainwashed fanatics who willingly sacrifice themselves for whatever religious bullshit. Next logical step should be the death penalty for suicide because why not?

[–]starblue 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

If they are who said we had to do it nicely. Desecrate them first, in whatever fashion their religion defines, so that they can't achieve the afterlife they hoped for. That will dissuade their other cohort from perform in a similar action.

This would be the logical next step, not your mockery and refusal to approach my statement from a serious point of view. Mockery occured in this context because you have no better counter to my argument. That's okay, but realize it for what it is.

Your statements are simply non sequitur.

[–]flugegeheimen 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Your "argument" was "we need the death penalty because of fanatics who don't fear death". I don't think something so obviously nonsensical necessitates your laments about not being taken seriously nine days later.

[–]boeing737 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

France is doomed, lets elect another street shitter in uk

[–]Tom_Bombadil 3 insightful - 5 fun3 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 5 fun -  (4 children)

Brahim Aoussaoui, a 21-year-old Tunisian migrant suspected of murdering three church-goers

The picture of the alleged decapitating terrorist looks fake.

It looks like a those computer generated photos. He's wearing a white hoodie with a white background?
It's basically CG Glamour Shots terror photos. Made in Israel, no doubt.
Comedy.

These terrorist can pull off the most fantastic capers.
Chopping heads off can't be easy.
Does anyone ever look into what kind of training this takes?

Fake AF.

[–]EuropeanAwakening 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Just stop.

[–]boeing737 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

?

[–]jet199[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Right? Apparently young, vain people facetuning is some conspiracy now.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Psy op or not, most people believe it's real, and that's what matters: the fear. But I think radical islamists are insane enough to do this kind of stuff.

For example, the attack in Québec city yesterday night was not a psy op. Not believing things outright is not the same thing as believing nothing ever happens.

[–]starblue 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Aha, I see. So because I have other responsibilities than social media and our conversation may happen over days or weeks (as the Internet and asynchronous commas are designed for) my statements and clarifications are moot.

Good to know that there's an expiry time. And you still haven't addressed anything I have said other than," uh uh!" Great response - and I even gave you two weeks to think about it.