you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Pis-dur[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

It is pollution you are disagreeing with thousands of scientists who have way bigger knowledge and experience on this topic than you. Also, changes are already very visible.

[–]Yin 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Credible climate scientists ("researchers") don't call CO2 pollution and the ones who do are usually political zealots and quacks. Are you also still under the false impression from the lie about a "97% consensus", which was a fake statistic erroneously surmised from a misleading survey question that didn't actually ask any of the responders to what degree they thought man-made CO2 contributed to warming? Responders to the survey later came out against that fake consensus claim, but globalist media and shitlib retards already got the talking points they wanted. The ends justify the means to them.

Start by reading:

https://www.climatedepot.com/2016/02/15/mit-climate-scientist-dr-richard-lindzen-mocks-97-consensus-it-is-propaganda/

https://www.climatedepot.com/?s=lindzen

He's one of many climate scientists who decided to start telling the truth about the charade and who was subsequently crucified by the usual suspects in globalist media who try to ruin the reputation of anyone who exposes them, considering they literally own mainstream media.

I used to be in the bubble. I know it's hard to break out of the bubble, realizing how much propaganda is coming from the top, whose only goal is to make you think you're "saving the planet" by signing on to nation-destroying policies. It's a sham. The contribution effects of human-made CO2 are very minimal. Earth was already in a short term warming period and it's literally in a cooling period if you zoom out.