you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Chipit 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Who cares? What business is it of ours? Spend your own money on it. Stop spending mine. Keep it right here, at home, where it's most needed. Empires go bankrupt from trying to police the world. The country suffers but the wealthy make a mint from being the middleman for all that cash.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

I support the America First doctrine, so I do believe we need to keep money at home, but once we've cleaned up our homeland it's in the best interests of our Nation to clean up the immediate area and then work out from there. That wouldn't include Turkey for quite a while, but it would need to be done eventually.

[–]Chipit 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

it's in the best interests of our Nation to clean up the immediate area and then work out from there.

How so? You know that this is globalism, right? You gonna pick up a rifle and go civilize the savages? And if not, why should anyone else die for your dreams of conquest?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Actually, Globalism is the belief that the world should be interconnected, especially in an economic sense. Globalists seek to break down borders and national identity and replace it with a homogeneous non-identity.

What I want to do is make the world a safer place for my Nation. Obviously a far-away Nation like Turkey doesn't pose much of a threat, but it still poses a threat. Mexico, however, provides a much larger threat so I would deal with it first.

Again: not like I support a war against Turkey. I'd actually oppose a war against Turkey. We have much bigger issues to deal with than that. But I still believe that Erdogan should be removed from power, just that it'll have to wait.

[–]Chipit 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Conquering all the other nations must in the end end with a global governance.

What I want to do is make the world a safer place for my Nation.

Attacking and destroying other nations makes the world a more hazardous place. Go figure, they don't like it and will get back at you any way possible.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Your wording is quite loaded. Words like "Conquering" and "destroying" are intended to make it seem as if I'm saying things I'm not.

I'd continue this conversation but the obsessive use of buzzwords makes it unsustainable. This is what left-wing media does: constantly using loaded words, constantly taking what people say out of context, and constantly ignoring what's actually being said.

[–]Chipit 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's what you mean. Overthrow Erdogan? Yeah, regime change. An invasion with destination: Ankara.

Crushing one country after another because we regard them as a "threat" has, as its inevitable outcome, a world where all countries are one. Imagine what the game of Risk looks like when someone wins. Armies on all territories, all opponents eliminated.

Maybe you don't realize what you're saying, but I do. Regime change is what we did in Iraq. Conquering and destroying are accurate words, no matter how much you don't like them.