all 28 comments

[–]PRSanon 8 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Never forget the twin towers.

Forget WTC 7 though.

[–]zyxzevn 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Based on physics it is impossible to get a near free fall collapse, without removing all supporting columns by force. It even falls into its own footprint, which requires special timing of the destruction of the columns. And watching the videos there is even more energy in the system, because huge parts of the building get blown sidewards.
Some even downwards. This shows a huge amount of excessive energy and expanding power, that is only produced by explosives or thermite. The behaviour is also 100% similar to a common demolition of a skyscraper.

Then we have the fires burning under water (as reported even in New Scientist) even weeks after the collapse.

The reason why some professional group would do this, was clear when the hit at the Pentagon only destroyed the administration. An administration that contained information about 2.3 Trillion of dollars. What wouldn't the corrupt people at the Pentagon do for a trillion or more?

Then we have the dancing Isrealis that knew that the planes were coming, and were putting them on camera. Israeli "artists" were also working with boxes that contained demolition wiring. The "hijackers" were Saudis that were partying and were staying near intelligence head quarters.

Then we have the "hijacked" planes that disappeared on the same course with military planes. Later they flew as fast as the military planes, which was faster and more agile than the real planes were capable of. The IDs on the engines of the planes also show that they were different planes. There were military drills going on related to hijacking. There were some intelligence officers in the "hijacked" planes, and they were capable of defending the plane themselves. This (together with all other evidence) makes it clear that it was all pre-planned and that the planes were switched.

The list goes on and on. Real hard evidence that shows a huge criminal act.
A crime that used real plane-crashes as a huge distraction.

The evidence also falsifies the conspiracy theory about a small foreign group organising all this from a foreign country. These were clearly designated as patsies.

[–]yishengqingwa666 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

I saw it on the news the day it happened. I know a professional demo job when I see one.

https://www.loosechange911.com/

[–]Drewski 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (5 children)

Loose change is good, but I actually recommend September 11: The New Pearl Harbor as the definitive 9/11 documentary. A word of warning, it's almost 5 hours long so you may want to watch it in several sittings.

[–]Jesus 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

It was created by Israeli Jews. Loose change was a limited hangout, that's why it is still on netflix. Watch anything from AEf911truth, the 9/11 documentary by Massimo Mazzuco.

[–]bjam27 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Crazy person

[–]Jesus 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

9/11 was orchestrated by ZioCons. May god bless you. I don't know who is crazy but it isn't me.

[–]Jesus 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Fallacy

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Jesus is the most sane person on SaidIt I know (aside from his belief in God).

[–]Jesus 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

WHo did the demo? Easy, LVI and ACE; both now defunct. They featured asbestos removal and demos. The worked with Eisenberg, Kroll, Lauder, Lowy and Silverstein, all Jewish ZioCons.

Trump is an odd character in this obvious intelligence agency job because as we know he is friends with many of these criminals but he was NOT part of the plot, only after it happened did he become complicit.

For instance, what did Trump have to say on teh day of 9/11?

https://www.invidio.us/watch?v=7h8vOmQm40A

Trump Interview 9/11/01: "They Had Bombs That Exploded Almost Simultaneously"

He never mentioned who was responsible a mere minutes after the dropnes hit the facdes like Israel's Mossad and other hard-line Likudniks did but he must have figured out his friends orchestrated the attacks because two days later Trump states:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dYOY4S1x8BU

^ ^ ^ Hook lien and sinker reading the offical government sanctioend 9/11 conspiracy theory. That fires brought down the buildings because they were just too damn hot and that it was orchestrated by radical jihadists. Quite a change in perspective from two days before when he figured bombs were placed in teh buildings and total collapse could not occur be fire or planes alone.

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

As of September 1st 2020, invidio.us has closed down.

To see this content, please select another instance,

or visit directly on YouTube.

Corrected link:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7h8vOmQm40A

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah I remember it well also. And the comments by the TV crew and pepole on the ground: "exactly like a controlled demolition", "Multiple secondary explosions: boom-boom-boom-boom" (while making a "floors pancaking" gesture) and so on.

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

But how did they get away with it?

How did they cover it up?

Why did everyone go along with the story?

Never Forget: Anthrax Attacks

The White House staff was already taking Cipro (Ciprofloxacin), a heavy duty antibiotic on 9/11. Perhaps people they were close to were handling the Anthrax that was mailed to leading Democrats and corporate media to threaten them to shut up. People died. They shut up. A patsy "died". The FBI proved it was an inside job and closed the unsolved, unprosecuted, and unpunished case.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2001_anthrax_attacks

[–]Orangutan[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

LOL wow. When you put it like that...

[–]iDontShift 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

https://www.drjudywood.com/wp/

totally disputed most interesting take on what really happened.

she is the only one to start by simple stating what the evidence shows that something else did that...

not sure if she gets into but the evidence those weren't even planes is huge.

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Really? You bring out the big loons to the conversation? Couldn't you find anyone more credible, who is not a misinfo agent, to cite and bring to the table?

[–]iDontShift 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

ad hominem.

people are dumb if they listen to you.

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

You may be correct.

I'm certain people are stupid if they believe Dr. Judy Wood, especially if they see the evidence stacked against her, or even her own words that prove she's a fraud and not rational.

[–]iDontShift 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

but they are totally intelligent if they follow the main stream media...

Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to reform (or pause and reflect). - mark twain

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I agree - but you have to be discerning about which non-MSM sources you get otherwise you're contributing to the problem by promoting the intentional discreditors, disinfo agents, and misinfo assets.

Alex Jones, though dramatic, used to be mostly good. Well before the 2016 election he got compromised or something and turned shill.

[–]Riva 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

It's propaganda mate.

Diversity is our strength.

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Are you a bot? What has that to do with the article?

[–][deleted]  (1 child)

[removed]

    [–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    You are not welcome asstroll, perpetually dragging down the conversation.

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    That article doesn't mean anything to me. It's like saying you called the cops and CSI didn't show up and figure out whodunit like in the TV show. Yeah, our air defense isn't like what you see in the movies. Everyone isn't on board, have the same info, and we don't have a constant CAP to prevent attacks from cylon raiders.

    It makes more sense if you think of it as a bloated and inefficient bureaucracy who has so few serious domestic threats they weren't expecting the Saudis to attack us that day.

    edit: if you want a real conspiracy theory, follow the money. Who ended up with trillions of dollars for killing 4k Americans. I don't know it is a conspiracy but if there is one, you need to look at who benefited.

    [–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    You are blind to your own blindness.

    How many "coincidences" does it take before you become skeptical?

    How come there haven't been any other such "air defense drills" like that before or since? There are too many other "coincidences" to list here.