you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Chipit 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

This is some very cringe redditor shit.

Do you have any actual arguments to make other than personal insults?

[–]FediNetizen 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Plenty. You can look through my comment history to see some of them. But /r/AmIVeryBadass exists for a reason, and I will always make fun of anyone that fits that profile.

[–]Chipit 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

Maybe you need less ridicule and more respect for people standing up for their rights. Or perhaps make actual arguments. Insults aren't arguments.

[–]FediNetizen 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Insults aren't arguments

And threatening to shoot people because you have to do your church service online isn't standing up for your rights. I gave the guy links to supreme court cases where they ruled that quarantine orders are constitutional. He completely ignored them. I'm all for a discussion but people like that deserve ridicule.

[–]Chipit 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Uh, did you completely ignore the part where the same mayor approved left-wing mass gatherings? So where was your waving around supreme court cases then?

[–]FediNetizen 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Uh, did you completely ignore the part where the same mayor approved left-wing mass gatherings?

Where did he bring that up?

[–]Dragonerne 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

And threatening to shoot people because you have to do your church service online isn't standing up for your rights.

Yes it is. My right to peaceably assemble is guarenteed in the constitution.

I gave the guy links to supreme court cases where they ruled that quarantine orders are constitutional. He completely ignored them. I'm all for a discussion but people like that deserve ridicule.

I rejected your discussion which is why you're responding with ridicule. There is nothing to "discuss". You want to take away my rights and I say no thanks. You then want a discussion to which I can only say: take up the discussion with my guns. That's exactly why we have them. To prevent tyrants like you from infringing on our rights.

[–]bald-janitor 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

No