If they're "not up for debate" please point me to the apparent holy tome you base this claim on. If society can choose not to recognize these, where do they begin to be recognized in the first place? It's almost as if you have to argue they exist and, by argument, also find caveats in where the so-called "negative" rights infringe on someone else. You are free to speak, you're just not free to speak in such a manner that transmits a pandemic.