you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]magnora7[S] 23 insightful - 5 fun23 insightful - 4 fun24 insightful - 5 fun -  (4 children)

From the top comment:

Take this:

https://ia801009.us.archive.org/25/items/gov.uscourts.nysd.447706/gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.143.0.pdf

Copy and paste the black parts, paste them into a text document. edit: and it reveals the black parts.

More documents found here:

https://pastebin.com/VHiDdX3V

So they REALLY messed that up. Unless it was intentional to force a mistrial. That'd be dirty as heck

[–]wahala 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Do you know who did this redacting? There is no excuse for doing it this way. It's malpractice.

[–]KennyLogins 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

To add to your question, does anyone have the original source, directly linked from a government website?

[–]wahala 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

[–]wahala 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Actually, that was Doc. 143, so this: https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.447706/gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.143.0_2.pdf

And the redactions can be lifted in this too. No good.