Megathread: Ghislaine Maxwell (Epstein) documents unsealed. Important excerpts will be added here.

submitted by magnora7 from reddit.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]wahala 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

Do you know who did this redacting? There is no excuse for doing it this way. It's malpractice.

[–]weirdthorn 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

There is no excuse for doing it this way. It's malpractice.

Might be intentional.

[–]wahala 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

True, but still malpractice.

[–]christine_grab 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Someone on Reddit suggested that this would be grounds for a mistrial and she'd get off.

[–]KennyLogins 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

To add to your question, does anyone have the original source, directly linked from a government website?

[–]wahala 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I think it's in here somewhere...https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4355835/giuffre-v-maxwell/?filed_after=&filed_before=&entry_gte=1090&entry_lte=&order_by=asc

Doc. 1090 if the link doesn't come up right.

[–]wahala 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Actually, that was Doc. 143, so this: https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.447706/gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.143.0_2.pdf

And the redactions can be lifted in this too. No good.