Resurfaced pictures from a wild party in Saint-Tropez have poked a major hole in the royal’s story amid backlash over his disastrous interview.

submitted by Mnemonic from news.com.au

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]magnora7 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Yeah I agree, I could see it going either way. They are quite detached. But if his PR advisor was obviously telling him not to, then why did he do it? Was someone else telling him to, or was it just a terrible decision he made all on his own?

[–]Mnemonic[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Yes his secretary (according to that 'PR-assistant article')

Andrew’s private secretary, Amanda Thirsk, had pushed for him to do the interview as a way to set the record straight and end the controversy that has become an embarrassment for the British royal family.

[–]magnora7 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

So he listened to his secretary over his PR guy, and it cost him dearly. Interesting