you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Chipit 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

The white wizard is Julian Assange, and you cheered when he went to prison.

When he was leaking things that made Bush look bad you loved him so hard Benedict Cumberbatch played him in the movie.

[–]Tom_BombadilNational status = freedom 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

Yo. You have this one completely backwards.

ESF is a hardcore JA supporter.

Regardless, JA isn't running for office.

I happen to think that JA is a limited hangout.

[–]Chipit 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

When you're so far into your bubble you assume everyone knows what ESF is.

[–]Tom_BombadilNational status = freedom 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

EndlessSunFlowers. The individual you're criticising.

[–]Chipit 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Yeah, that's my whole point. Apparently you know this user, and assume everyone else does as well. But we don't, but you don't see it because you're in your bubble. It's part of the Dunning–Kruger effect.

[–]Tom_BombadilNational status = freedom 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Sure.

The white wizard is Julian Assange, and you cheered when he went to prison.

Except, ESF is a great supporter of JA. For some reason you decided to make assumptions about someone that you know nothing about.

It's probably safe to assume that you're suffering from the Dunning–Kruger effect.

[–]Chipit 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Nobody knows what your abbreviations mean except people in your bubble with you. It is common courtesy to expand them upon first use, but you dispensed with that because it's so self-evidently obvious to you.

[–]Tom_BombadilNational status = freedom 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Maybe.

Or maybe you're the only one in your Dunning–Kruger effect bubble, and your upset that you couldn't figure it out by googling it (which is funny).

All you had to do was look for the only word on the posting that started with the letter "E".
/s/EndlessSunflowers was also the only individual who you were criticising, so... There weren't many dots to connect.

BTW: Psychologist love to make up bullshit like the "Dunning–Kruger effect", cause they want to pretend that what they are doing is scientifically valid. This crap is make up by some influential circles jerkers, and the sheep follow the herd..

The bulk of this garbage is made up to create a reason for these wangers to publish in their wang-job journals. It's fake science.

[–]Chipit 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I shouldn't have to search for mysterious acronyms. Define them the first time you use them.

All you had to do was look for the only word on the posting that started with the letter "E".

How the hell was I supposed to know to do that? Obvious to you because you're in the bubble.

[–]Tom_BombadilNational status = freedom 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I'm bored with this.

Bye.