you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Maniak🥃😾[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Replying To @ScottAdamsSays being a clueless dipshitlib yet again:

  1. We all like free speech.

  2. We also understand why you can't yell FIRE in a crowded theater.

Twitter is arguing #2 (in effect). Most of its critics are defending #1.

Can we discuss the same topic and see if that makes it easier to agree?

[–]penelopepnortneyBecome ungovernable 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Scott was replying to this tweet from Bret:

Twitter is in no position to judge Dr. Malone. If he, as inventor of mRNA vaccine technology, is concerned, we should all be. If Big Tech and Big Pharma have another perspective, they’re free to voice it. But censorship of whistleblowing experts must not stand.


Comments in thread:

How about the theater is really on fire?!

.

Scott, “we” all don’t like free speech. Many in power like to reduce or eliminate speech they don’t like. Do you disagree with that?

.

You would have to assume that Twitter is dealing in good faith first, which it isn’t.

.

I think Malone said it best when he explained that he is qualified to make the positions he’s advocating so show where he’s wrong. Respond to his points! Removing him entirely breeds more misinformation and makes it harder to prove him wrong.


A number of users also point out that Scott is wrong about his claim that you can't yell fire in a crowded theater.