all 10 comments

[–]mahavishnunj 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

could you have possibly found a shittier site to link to?

[–]IkeConn 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

I'll bet the faculty of that school and the board of education are chock full of pedo faggots.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

upvoted due to likely being true

[–]penelopepnortneyBecome ungovernable[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

I'd downvote this comment if there was a downvote. I posted the article because I think trying to shoehorn people into acceptance is stupid and does more harm than good, but your comment goes way over the line.

[–]IkeConn 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

The truth always hurts.

[–]penelopepnortneyBecome ungovernable[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

There's no "truth" in the offensive slurs you used or the insinuations you made. And there was nothing in the article to even suggest what you were saying so maybe you were projecting?

[–]IkeConn 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Are you going to go into counseling mode now and use some more touchy feely words? If there wasn't an LGBTQ agenda in that school and school district then why was a cis student persecuted for telling the biological truth well outside the school's sphere of influence? Projecting my ass. That cis kid was targeted by an LGBTQ agenda plain and simple. Touchy feely that shit up all you want but in the wash that's the fact Jack.

[–]penelopepnortneyBecome ungovernable[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

You obviously have some anger issues around this subject, and that is your problem. Keeping this sub within the confines of civil engagement is my problem.

If you know anything about WOTB from our reddit site, you know that we avoid using bans, but we do have tools to use with people who can't seem to get our one rule - DBAD. You can talk about what you think is behind this student's suspension till the cows come home, no problem; but you start throwing around pejorative terms like faggots, you're going to get leashed.

[–]IkeConn 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Found the redditor that wants to quash all dissent with a ban hammer.

[–]penelopepnortneyBecome ungovernable[S] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

From the article, more at the link:

A high school student in New Hampshire is suing the school district after he was suspended from the football team for insisting there are only two genders in private text messages. His lawsuit argues that the suspension was a violation of his first amendment rights.

.

The suit states that the freshman at Exeter High School was suspended from the football team for one game after the administration obtained a text conversation, outside of school grounds, that he had with another student over gender identity. The suit, filed on the student’s behalf by Christian-based organization Cornerstone Action, argues that he stated his Catholic-based belief that there are only two genders.

.

The lawsuit further argues that the school’s non-binary gender identity policy is an infringement of the student’s First Amendment rights.

The policy states the school’s community should respect student’s preferred name and pronoun related to their gender identity. Failure to respect others’ gender identities is a violation of the policy.

The student does not deny violating the policy.

.

“He in fact denied, and will continue to deny, that any person can belong to a gender other than that of ‘male’ or ‘female’” the lawsuit says.

The student, it goes on, “will never refer to any individual person using plural pronouns such as ‘they,’ using contrived pronouns such as ‘ze,’ or with any similar terminology that reflects values which (the student) does not share.”