all 9 comments

[–][deleted]  (7 children)

[removed]

    [–]magnora7 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

    So you go around trying to smear saidit for people doing pyramid of debate violations, and then you make posts like this? I see.

    [–][deleted]  (5 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]magnora7 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

      Perhaps you can show me a better way to respond to messages that wants to kill all X?

      Your lack of reading comprehension and desire to stir controversy never ceases to surprise.

      As I already said, in TWO different messages to you, you can PM me to expedite the process more, but it's not ever going to be instant. Please stop misrepresenting the site and deliberately misunderstanding things, or we will ban you for violating the pyramid of debate by constantly spreading lies with the intent to undermine the website. I see what you are doing, and it's not appreciated.

      [–][deleted]  (3 children)

      [deleted]

        [–]magnora7 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

        Then I believe you'll have a grand day full of surprises after this place becomes really active and you start banning people for breaking unwritten rules again.

        What do you mean by that? Is that some sort veiled threat or something? You're always saying stuff like this to try and manipulate the admins, yet you don't actually seem to care that much about improving the quality of the site given what you often post.

        Your basis for threatening to ban me is due to the way you chose to interpret my action, no matter my explanations.

        Then why do I have to explain things 5 times while you continue to say the wrong things, always phrasing it as a "gotcha" moment? It's extremely tiring and emotionally manipulative.

        Seriously, if you're not happy here, please leave.

        [–][deleted]  (1 child)

        [deleted]

          [–]magnora7 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

          If you continue to ban people for subjective and unwritten rules as the community grows, you will meet more people with the same concerns as me.

          We don't ban people for subjective and unwritten rules though, that's my point. We follow our own rules pretty well, much better than reddit or voat does, and they're much larger than us!

          More and more of the comments I'm supposed to reply to are damn demoralizing. So now I engage in trying to change what the community and operators accepts. People start going through my stuff to find straw man counter arguments

          You mean exactly like you've done to me and d3rr and saidit over the last 3 days?

          As I explained before there is a difference between legitimate concern, and using the appearance of concern to manipulate others.

          You talk the talk, but you don't walk the walk. Your "concern" rings extremely hollow when you've already cried wolf 50 times, sorry.

          Again, if you're this unhappy here, then please leave. The rules are the rules. I'm not going to modify them to suit your interests, especially given your demeanor and treatment of the admins in previous comments and threads.

          [–]EndlessSunflowers[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

          Bernie Sanders leaving the Woody Guthrie Museum

          [–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

          I don't trust Bernie because of this pro-war policies, his pro-arming of Syrian rebels policies, his pro national security apparatus policies, his Zionist tendencies, if anything, he's another politician, one of the better ones, who will do nothing. Look at Opensecrets.org o see who is funding him this election. It's big banks.

          [–]magnora7 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

          Look at Opensecrets.org o see who is funding him this election. It's big banks.

          Do you have a link to that by any chance? I was just seeing something earlier today saying Bernie has more donors than the rest combined, and now also has more money. He seems to be one of the few who doesn't take the corporate money, so I'd be interested in seeing proof to the contrary

          I don't see it here, but this site seems to be missing a lot of donors, obviously: https://www.opensecrets.org/search?q=bernie+sanders&type=donors

          [–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

          https://www.opensecrets.org/2020-presidential-race/contributors?id=N00000528

          I should correct myself, surveillance companies and the army, amazon, google, microsoft, IBM, etc., but his past stances on Syria, Iraq and Palestine illustrate that he's jusst another politician. Warren is even worse and Trump is the worst of all. Interestingly, Trump in his forst election didn't get a lot of mo ey from Banks and surveillance, telecommunication companies, Hillary did, but now they are giving him hundreds of thousands.

          He's also spent the most in google ads, sanders has only spent 2,700,000.

          [–]a_man_a_plan_pancake 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

          We all love Woody but his solution to the gross inequities that he saw was, basically, communism. From our perspective of the future we know the result of communist ideologies and so we can forgive Woody for his hopeful, idealistic but ultimately unrealistic and naive hopes and dreams for the working man. Though I do rather enjoy the image of some dirt poor share-cropper violently slicing the throat of a 'fascist' all the while singing "This Land".