Daily reminder that 2019 Reddit would ban 2008 Reddit.

submitted by Bullet_Storm from i.redd.it

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]WebcomicAddiction 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Why so? Cant own me with facts and logic?

[–]RuckFeddit 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

You're either a troll, a shill or just plain stupid.

Troll: Unrealistically defensive and not even open for a discussion, just confrontation or a reaction.

Stupid: You're more concerned appearing to be correct than actually discussing the topic. Emotional and hysterical responses. Missing important information. Ignoring what's being presented and continuing on your own tangent (appearing to be correct)

Shill: blatantly ignoring points I've made so you can continue your narrative. Loads of ad-hominems and low tier quips. Basically trying to paint me as something ridiculous so my argument can't possibly be correct. It's a given that anyone who has to resort to ad-hominems to get their point across doubt themselves and the argument they are presenting.

I felt like I should clarify why I'm not discussing with you at least, and nobody else seems to be either. It's a waste of time.

[–]WebcomicAddiction 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Troll: Unrealistically defensive and not even open for a discussion, just confrontation or a reaction.

Emotional and hysterical responses.

Didnt know that replying in a comedic-ish way can low key piss you off. My bad. No jokes from now on. Well, maybe a lil' bit.

Ignoring what's being presented and continuing on your own tangent (appearing to be correct)

I've only ignored one of your arguments which is the one about NYT editor for the reason that i've never heard about it and therefore have no opinion on it.

Loads of ad-hominems

Where?

Basically trying to paint me as something ridiculous so my argument can't possibly be correct.

I mean i do reply in a trollish manner cause i dont expect much. But by all means you are free to change my mind.

Here, ill link you a video that explains what i meant by you "lacking a critical information" so that you will forgive me my "horrible debate tactics": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=06yy88tLWlg&list=WL&index=40&t=0s

[–]RuckFeddit 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Nah I'm good thanks