No I understand perfectly. Your point is that - you don't actually engage with these fake internet narratives as though they exist on the scale of true to false. You just enjoy them as a storytelling device which confirms all your hateful paranoid biases.

So when someone shows that the fake narratives you enjoy are actually factually incorrect in the real world - of course your response is, who cares? Why would anyone care whether the internet narratives are true or false, in your view? They're just conservative talking points to be enjoyed as a method to trigger libs and further your paranoid politics - it's stupid to actually expect them to exist as true or false things.

Which is basically the point of this entire submission. OP keeps replying 'yeah sure it's technically fake but isn't it fun as a narrative! Aren't these great talking points that validate our make-believe internet worldview!"