you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]zyxzevn[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Deanna McLeod
Better analysis of the Pfizer data and the real world data
Very neutral analysis of the data.

The Pfizer data (from the study) shows that the damage is far more than the disease.
In the field about 75% of people have side-effects, of which many (5%?) severe. Yet, this is never reported due to the bad reporting system.
The efficacy becomes negative after a while.

Possible explanation: They did not test all of the injected for covid. So it seemed effective.
In the field there are also different tests and criteria for "vaxxed" and "unvaxxed".