you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]infocom6502 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

well, sandy definitely had real victims.

this was ages ago and my memory is foggy, but i think when i looked into it i concluded it was definitely real, but the press (or some corrupt entity) also used crisis actors in order to fully exploit this mega-tragedy.

I think this is sort of the default. Real tragedies, but rely on crisis actors to fully exploit such crises (whether they were natural or planned/collaborated by those carrying out their agenda). With real victims, it's a nervous wild card for the PR agencies. They can't guarantee anything that will come from a natural interview; they like scripts.

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

well, sandy definitely had real victims.

Proof?

So far I've seen NONE. And I've looked hard.

Yes, there's a lot of misinformation on all sides. But there is also undeniable evidence stacked up high that the "event" was staged in a VERY sketchy environment - with VERY sketchy media divisive coverage and overblown political reactions.

If they can lie so hard about wars, 9/11, and now COVID and stick so hard to their manufactured narratives, why would you think they wouldn't do it for a school shooting?

[–]infocom6502 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

I'm very stale on the topic and probably am not going to pour a lot of time into researching Sandy Hook in the near future.

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I am stale now too. Years ago I did some deep diving though, enough to be thoroughly convinced that it among MANY other crisis events before and since the 2013 NDAA are psyops. Almost everything the corporate media presents is either a lie or spun to be inverted.