FDA + CDC cannot explain the Florida VAERS data (so they change the subject)

submitted by zyxzevn from stevekirsch.substack.com

all 4 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]zyxzevn[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

... we talked to one neurologist in California and she had over 1,000 of her 20,000 patients who reported new serious neurological issues shortly after getting the vaccine. That isn’t overreporting because she only filed 2 VAERS reports, not 1,000. In 11 years, she’s never needed to make a single VAERS report; this year, she needed to make 1,000.

[–]SMCAB 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

But but but, I have some links from CNN and The Guardian, and the New York Times that completely refute this!!

[–]Ehhhhhh 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Think about how much higher the reporting would be if doctors weren't threatened. How many got a letter like this and followed its advice?

[–]SoCo 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I read the FDA's response. They didn't even address what his health department found. They were insultingly misdirecting and wrote a letter like a teen girl having a freak out.

They went on and on about VAERS data being meaningless and how various cherry picked studies found this and that, which disprove the real world results. Florida's public guidance was not about VAERS, nor was it citing VAERS.