all 4 comments

[–]zyxzevn[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Video was Removed: My first youtube censorship experience

The contents was pretty basic:
The incident rate of severe injuries in the Pfizer study was reported as 0.7%, per injection.
So using this same number, multiplied by the number of injections gives us an indication how many severe injuries we can expect.
In the VAERS reporting we see 41x (?) less injuries.

The analysis is just very basic and is just meant to get an indication of the under-reporting.

In more thorough reports we see 100x under-reporting.
This number varies due to categorization and cover-up of data.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

VAERS does check on things and deletes them if they think it was fake, like there was a guy saying the vaccine turned him into the incredible hulk, they quickly saw that, removed it. So it's pretty accurate despite what pro vaxxers say. But I bet they also just remove a lot of legit ones. I bet they think having myocareditis is the only valid thing people could report but a lot of people get other terrible symptoms resembling long haul covid from the vaccines. Then of course there is the under reporting, if one did get the shot and then got sick from it they may be in denial and not want to believe they got brainwashed so won't report it to VAERS which they think is a nazi fake news online thing cuz of the media telling them that.

[–]zyxzevn[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Here I disagree.
The studies that tracked down ALL people that were injected, found a lot more side-effects.
And from those studies the under-reporting factor is much higher, around 100x.
Peak prosperity has a very "neutral" video about the under reporting, and was placing the risk in context with the risk of the disease.
But if we take a better look at the numbers we see that even for old people the vax gives 5x more deaths than the disease. See study

The VAERS is setup by vax-manufacturers as a fake feed-back system. It has no good scientific meaning.
You can not tell how many reports are lost, nor how many reports are wrong.
This is setup to avoid real responsibility, and with that it increases the profits.

With the current corrupt climate, doctors are afraid of reporting side-effects. Even if it affects themselves or their children. They are to lose their jobs.
Many people are more afraid of the disease than the side-effects, and want to keep up the faith in the vaxx.
Other people can not even believe that the vaxx could have bad effects, or think it does not matter.
Many do not even know how to report, I had to post the links on reddit for some people that were severely harmed.

From a health-safety perspective, any report should be taken seriously.
Because this is the only reporting system that is currently active.
And because this gene-based injection is an experiment, we have to track every person that is injected (voluntary).
For example: if people with peanut allergies all die, we have to know that.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I think we agree. I agree it's underrepoorted but the reason why is people being ashamed of being brainwashed so won't admit it and will suffer in silence.