you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Alphix[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

u/JasonCarswell since you ask for an explanation, I'm not going to give you a Ph.D. in nuclear physics. We'll just use your eyes.

Look at this explosion. Look when there is a glowing column of gas under the mushroom cloud. That GLOWING gas is not "burning". Those are not FLAMES. That is what is called plasma: superheated matter that is ionised from the heat. Such heat cannot be made by chemical explosives. It is ONLY made inside nuclear reactions. This plasma rises, then falls again, still glowing, as it cools. That is not fuel nor gunpowder nor any other known explosive or combustible: those turn to light, heat and often also SMOKE. They don't keep glowing for a minute after the blast. Once again, look with your eyes: THOSE ARE NOT FLAMES, it's just GLOWING while floating in mid-air for a whole minute.

Moreover, look at that mushroom cloud: how long does it burn? Have you ever seen gunpowder burning for a whole minute? No, it blows up and it's done. Look up any and all conventional bomb designs: booooooom and it's over. No chemicals explode continuously for a minute.

I'm not saying this was ONLY a nuke. Obviously there's lots of other things blowing up in there: missiles, grenades, shells, whatever. And they've been doing this every single time in the past couple decades: explode some other shit, and then a nuke, hoping to disguise the nuclear nature of one of the multiple explosions, hoping that the sheeple will go: It's not because it makes a mushroom cloud that it's a nuke, you moron.

Well I'm not firstly talking about the mushroom cloud, I'm talking about the plasma column. Again, plasma is only created at temperatures that are way beyond the capabilities of any chemical explosion.

If you're going to argue, think about this: jet fuel VAPORIZES concrete from its heat. Correct?

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

I don't want a PhD nor need your sass that takes more energy from you than me.
I just wanted to know what to look for. Your explanation is good. Thank you.
The tweet is great too.
I'm not a moron and I do know about mushroom clouds.
I wasn't arguing. I was seeking explaination.
Name calling should be beneath you.
But obviously you can't control yourself. Sad.

[–]Alphix[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I have not called you a single name in the previous post.

I get irked because this is a site where supposedly people are open to discussing things that Joe Average might have zero interest in, but in fact it looks like everybody's looking for their echo chamber. Yes, my assertions are disconcerting, even unnerving, because they are so outside of even conspiracy theorist circles. But I'm only making them because they're true. Now I'm not asking that everybody take me at my word for everything, but at some point, getting dismissed out of hand on such an important topic just because nobody else is talking about this is... Just plain wrong.

[–]In-the-clouds 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

That explanation made sense.

Do you think the 2020 Beirut port attack on their grain silos was a nuke?

[–]Alphix[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Yes, it was! Of course there was a stockpile of fertilizers that also detonated, but yes, they put a nuke in there too. And in Yemen in 2015 which was the EXACT SAME scenario as we just had yesterday. And if you look at the blast in Yemen (I posted it somewhat recently) it should leave ABSOLUTELY NO doubt whatsoever that it was a nuke.

Here is the one in Yemen, check out the mega telltales of nuclear decay at 2:30:

https://odysee.com/@Knochenbrigade:c/saudi-tactical-nuclear-strike-on-yemen:4

[–]In-the-clouds 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

The URL stamp in the video revealed an impressive collection of recorded explosions on YouTube

nuclear decay at 2:30

I saw some sparkles. The video you shared from Yemen shows an explosion that resembles the one in Khmelnitsky, Ukraine. Is that a column of plasma seen in both?

Yemen-1 Yemen-2

Khmelnitsky, Ukraine

~

Regarding the intro to the video, which claims to be to the glory of Jesus Christ, I don't believe it. The only thing Christians should glory in is what Jesus Christ did for us on the cross, and not what man destroys with his weapons. Jesus died for all nations and peoples and America will be destroyed, as prophesied by Jesus Christ in the book of Revelation. Babylon is fallen, is fallen! It has become a habitation of every evil spirit!

[–]Alphix[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yep, that's the plasma column. As for the stuff in one of the videos, I agree, it is out of place.

[–]Alphix[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

There are still a few with the missile used in Beirut clearly visible:

https://odysee.com/@MaatTV:6/Beirut-Explosion-Missile-Strike-Footage-:1

There's one where we also see the plane that shoots it, but I can't find it right now.

[–]In-the-clouds 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That was my first time seeing that video. Reminds me of the attack on the World Trade Center in 2011, how other videos emerged showing a different narrative than what the big news corporations showed.