What is a Woman suppression causing internal war at Twitter?

submitted by xoenix from twitter.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]ClassroomPast6178 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

That was the UK 2021 census and a terrible question that no one understood because they let the troons write it and they made it deliberately obscure.

If two separate polls produce similar data, there’s something to the data. The data also aligns with differences between men and women on the big 5 personality traits. I know this disrupts the rad fem narrative of misogyny causing everything, but maybe it’s worth considering that you may be wrong. Fact is men don’t support troonery anywhere near as much as women do, women seem to be leading the charge to trans children. It’s also women driving CRT and other woke shit.

It’s not all women, and women are fighting it, and there are men supporting this shit, but don’t let ideology blinker you.

[–]QueenBread 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Fact is men don’t support troonery anywhere near as much as women do, women seem to be leading the charge to trans children.

To know who is behind a movement, find out who benefits from it.

Women don't benefit from the TRAs cult. Men do.

You can take into account women's tendency for self-harm: an angry man lashes out at others; an angry woman lashes out at herself (or her children, which she considers part of herself).

Men want this. Men lead this. Men organized this.

Many women, however, support it due to self-hate. Just like how even if we always talk about transwomen and it's men who benefit from "going trans", the silent majority of trans is transmen. Women, that is.

[–]LyingSpirit472 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

And you really don't think the eugenics angle of the TRAs cult benefits women?

Remember, if the TRAs cult goes unchecked, then women get the chance to get every man who has even a single unattractive quality to them gets sterilized and takes their subpar genes out of the gene pool, leaving only perfect men unsterilized and giving them a better class of men who will be able to breed with them. And even though that dramatically lowers the amount of men available to give them children? Still fine- they can make that man who left them hurt by transing their son and making sure their bloodline stops with them.

[–]Vulptexghost fox girl ^w^ 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Maybe eugenics aren't so bad. The defective being able to reproduce is what led to people like me existing who are doomed to unending misery from birth. People who can't succeed at anything no matter what, because of poor genetics. People who will always be depressed or diseased because of their genetics, with no hope. People who are too sensitive to handle even mild hardship. People who quite literally do not belong among the human race or even in the world we live in. Even if I wanted to have kids, that would be incredibly selfish of me, since the chances are high that they will inherit my botched traits. The gene pool is absolutely fucked, and we wonder why we're so plagued, both physically and mentally. I think the sad truth is things like depression and talentlessness are primarily genetic, and for many nothing could possibly save them. I was born miserable, not even the finest circumstances will be able to change that now. In modern civilization there's no longer any processes cleaning up bad genes. We talk about how it's cruel to continue breeding pets such as pugs that have traits that make their lives an endless struggle, so why does the same not apply to humans?