all 17 comments

[–]ClassroomPast6178 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

Stunningly and bravely abusing children.

[–]LordoftheFliesAmeri-kin 2.0. Pronouns: MegaWhite/SuperStraight/UltraPatriarchy 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

You know, feminists were so gosh-darned busy with their "teach men not to rape" campaigns that they somehow completely overlooked the women doing it.

[–]OuroborosTheory 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

easy! just redefine "rape" and "abuse" as something only half the planet can do

[–]LyingSpirit472 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Um...did you consider this person might be really, really, REALLY sorry they did it- and being sorry is basically regretting it, so really the victim raped her? Checkmate, men...

[–]QueenBread 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Rape? Did she force them into sex? No.

[–]LordoftheFliesAmeri-kin 2.0. Pronouns: MegaWhite/SuperStraight/UltraPatriarchy 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

According to the article, she's checking herself into a mental health facility. Uh-huh, and she's totally not laying the groundwork for that eventual defense of "but your Honor, I was clearly mentally impaired when I was fucking those kids, so if you could go ahead and just remand me to one of those care facilities instead of big girl lockup, that'd be great!"

[–]IMissPorn 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Well, I can easily believe she's insane. Not necessarily in the legal "can't tell right from wrong" sense, but certainly in "more issues than Time magazine" sense. Incidentally she hasn't thus far been charged with fucking any kids, though it does seem pretty likely that happened. Some of the teens said she "propositioned" them, but evidently they declined. If others accepted, they must not be talking.

[–]LyingSpirit472 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Hey, we should CELEBRATE this person:

The criminal has identified as a teenage boy after this rape she committed. As the criminal is thus a trans man, it is thus necessary to throw the criminal into a men's prison [filled with men who haven't seen a woman in years and REALLY don't like child molestors.] Only someone who is truly insane would happily enter a men's prison under those circumstances.

The criminal has also checked into a mental health facility, laying the groundwork for claiming that she's insane in order to get off for the crime.

By checking into a mental health facility, it claims that she is crazy. However, by choosing to go to a mental health facility instead of being thrown into men's prison and what a biologically female child molestor can likely expect in a men's prison, she has proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that she is NOT crazy, as only a crazy person would happily put themselves into genpop prison as a child molestor. HOWEVER, by identifying as a man, knowing that prisoners are put into prison based on their gender identity, she has put herself as a woman child molestor in men's prison, proving beyond a shadow of a doubt she is crazy.

Therefore, this woman both IS and IS NOT crazy at the same time.

Let us laud this criminal; SHE HAS FINALLY BROKEN CATCH-22!

[–]iamonlyoneman 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

A woman in a mens prison will be buried under a tidal wave of semen. She will be riding constantly.

[–]Femaleisnthateful 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Sure, why not?

[–]LtGreenCo 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I kinda want to know wtf the teenage boys were thinking going to that disgusting hobo tent in the woods to bang a woman who is about as sexually appealing as a garbage bin.

[–]QueenBread 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

This is a good example of the difference between women and men when it comes to being a sexual predator (reminder that a good 95% of sexual predators are male). This woman is trying to fuck teenagers. She won't force them. A man in her state would try to fuck not teens but kids. And he would force them.

I mean, look at her. Don't tell me she looks scary or dangerous.

I am now waiting for the angry comments claiming women are absolutely dangerous rapists.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

No, I can't imagine she forced them. Forced rape should be treated much more harshly than statutory rape that was consensual

[–]QueenBread 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I agree. It's just biology, the thing TRAs try to deny so much. The one awful crime women are scaringly good at is hurting or killing their own children. But rape? No.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah, I can't say I have ever been worried a woman might try to forcefully rape me, just not on my radar of things to worry about

[–]xoenix 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I call this the Hail Mary gender.

[–]iamonlyoneman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

She's not a cougar, she's a gay teen boy. You can't prosecute, checkmate, police!