use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~6 users here now
Seen a horribly oppressed transethnic otherkin blog their plight? Wept at how terrible it is for the suffering of multiple systems to go unheard every day? Been unable to even live with the thought of the identities of someone's headmates being cisdenied?
Then you've come to the right place!
Confused? Here's a moderately helpful dictionary of terms.
How to find good TiA material!
Before posting please check the known Satire/Troll Wiki
Remember to use Nitter for Twitter links!
Join the SocialJusticeinAction discord!
Can you explain why this woman was arrested?
submitted 10 months ago by Chipit from independent.co.uk
view the rest of the comments →
[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 10 months ago (19 children)
Certainly chipit.
She's charged with
https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/PEN/260.10
SECTION 260.10
Endangering the welfare of a child
Penal (PEN) CHAPTER 40, PART 3, TITLE O, ARTICLE 260 § 260.10 Endangering the welfare of a child.
A person is guilty of endangering the welfare of a child when: He or she knowingly acts in a manner likely to be injurious to the physical, mental or moral welfare of a child less than seventeen years old or directs or authorizes such child to engage in an occupation involving a substantial risk of danger to his or her life or health; or Being a parent, guardian or other person legally charged with the care or custody of a child less than eighteen years old, he or she fails or refuses to exercise reasonable diligence in the control of such child to prevent him or her from becoming an "abused child," a "neglected child," a "juvenile delinquent" or a "person in need of supervision," as those terms are defined in articles ten, three and seven of the family court act.
A person is guilty of endangering the welfare of a child when:
He or she knowingly acts in a manner likely to be injurious to the physical, mental or moral welfare of a child less than seventeen years old or directs or authorizes such child to engage in an occupation involving a substantial risk of danger to his or her life or health; or
Being a parent, guardian or other person legally charged with the care or custody of a child less than eighteen years old, he or she fails or refuses to exercise reasonable diligence in the control of such child to prevent him or her from becoming an "abused child," a "neglected child," a "juvenile delinquent" or a "person in need of supervision," as those terms are defined in articles ten, three and seven of the family court act.
[–]Chipit[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - 10 months ago (18 children)
Just so everyone knows, the above is a paid poster trying to disrupt our conversations on this site. Click the "block user" button above and disengage.
[–]noshore4me 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 10 months ago (17 children)
Your post asked a question, the person responded with a succinct answer. How is any of that a disruption, unless you were asking the initial question in bad faith?
[–]Chipit[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 10 months ago (16 children)
He has a history of being a paid poster posting disruptive content. I'm reminding everyone of that. Why possibly jump to his defense? Weird.
[–]noshore4me 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 10 months ago (15 children)
I take every interaction at face value. When I see someone using a post history as a way to try to negate legitimate information, I react. It's not a defense of anyone, it's stating what the audience sees.
[–]Chipit[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 10 months ago (14 children)
He constantly defends Biden and Pfizer. Those keywords have to be on his company's social media dashboard.
[–]noshore4me 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 10 months ago (13 children)
If you say so. I don't search people's histories. Was their response to your question asking why the woman was arrested inaccurate in any way?
[–]Chipit[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 10 months ago (12 children)
You're playing defense for him, eh? Another one...
[–]noshore4me 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 10 months ago (0 children)
Believe what you want. But dismissing accurate information because of the source is just as bad as believing inaccurate because of the source. Sorry if I didn't contribute to the echo chamber you were seeking.
[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 10 months ago (10 children)
Just so everyone knows, the above is a paid poster trying to radicalise users of this site. Click the "block user" button above and disengage.
[–]Chipit[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 10 months ago (4 children)
Wow, you really got triggered by being exposed, eh?
/u/Chipit is a long-time poster who consistently and regularly posts dissident political content, quite unlike what paid posters are employed to do. He's a great example of what this site needs more of. The group of paid posters that plague this site consider him a threat, which is all you need to know.
view the rest of the comments →
[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (19 children)
[–]Chipit[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - (18 children)
[–]noshore4me 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (17 children)
[–]Chipit[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (16 children)
[–]noshore4me 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (15 children)
[–]Chipit[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (14 children)
[–]noshore4me 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (13 children)
[–]Chipit[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (12 children)
[–]noshore4me 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (10 children)
[–]Chipit[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (4 children)
[–]Chipit[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (4 children)