use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~2 users here now
Seen a horribly oppressed transethnic otherkin blog their plight? Wept at how terrible it is for the suffering of multiple systems to go unheard every day? Been unable to even live with the thought of the identities of someone's headmates being cisdenied?
Then you've come to the right place!
Confused? Here's a moderately helpful dictionary of terms.
How to find good TiA material!
Before posting please check the known Satire/Troll Wiki
Remember to use Nitter for Twitter links!
Join the SocialJusticeinAction discord!
Killing someone over a word is totally ok
submitted 1 year ago by Keri10 from i.imgur.com
view the rest of the comments →
[–]ClassroomPast6178 13 insightful - 3 fun13 insightful - 2 fun14 insightful - 2 fun14 insightful - 3 fun - 1 year ago (3 children)
Nope. Should be manslaughter, probably didn’t intend to kill the man but he did. The judge can take the racial abuse into consideration when he is considering mitigating circumstances for sentencing purposes.
However, if the guy has made statements about how he would kill anyone who calls him that word, then that’s probably good enough to prove intent and that’s murder, baby.
Don’t say shit about what you plan to do, if there’s any chance you could be in court for doing that shit in future.
[–]Q-Continuum-kin 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (2 children)
Yeah the poll is poorly worded. There's some number of people who probably answered not guilty with this in mind.
[–]LyingSpirit472 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (1 child)
But there's likely some number of people who would have said not guilty even if the worker intended for the punch to kill the customer and punched the guy out for no reason, solely because he wanted to punch out and delete a white person.
[–]Q-Continuum-kin 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (0 children)
Ok but it's on the question and the person who asked the question to be more clear otherwise each person interprets the question differently and also each person reading the results can interpret it differently. There are 2 layers of ambiguity.
view the rest of the comments →
[–]ClassroomPast6178 13 insightful - 3 fun13 insightful - 2 fun14 insightful - 2 fun14 insightful - 3 fun - (3 children)
[–]Q-Continuum-kin 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (2 children)
[–]LyingSpirit472 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (1 child)
[–]Q-Continuum-kin 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)