use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~7 users here now
Seen a horribly oppressed transethnic otherkin blog their plight? Wept at how terrible it is for the suffering of multiple systems to go unheard every day? Been unable to even live with the thought of the identities of someone's headmates being cisdenied?
Then you've come to the right place!
Confused? Here's a moderately helpful dictionary of terms.
How to find good TiA material!
Before posting please check the known Satire/Troll Wiki
Remember to use Nitter for Twitter links!
Join the SocialJusticeinAction discord!
Liberalism is a mental disorder
submitted 1 year ago by [deleted] from i.imgur.com
view the rest of the comments →
[–]Q-Continuum-kin 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (5 children)
It says liberal not leftist. Liberalism is right wing on everything except social issues.
[–]YJaewedwqewq 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (4 children)
So, in other words, they're left wing in every way that is substantively important.
[–]Q-Continuum-kin 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (3 children)
No, leftist ideology is 99% economic because power is derived from wealth inequality. Flattening racial and gender hierarchy happen to go along with that concept of flattening all power hierarchy.
Liberals use performative wokeness to hyper focus on things like race and trick people into believing that appointing a few oligarchs of color solves racism and economic disparity while they do things like bail out a failed bank.
[–]YJaewedwqewq 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (2 children)
I fail to see how this contradicts what I said. Leftist ideology being based in economics doesn't make the fact that they're socially liberal any less wrong, and it doesn't make their other views matter more.
[–]Q-Continuum-kin 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (1 child)
You said "in every way that is substantively important". I don't think there is substance to the way liberals use tokenism to pretend to care about populist views. Liberals want to maintain a power hierarchy. It's just a different hierarchy from the old patriarchal system.
There is another group of people who we could toss the "mental issues" label at. Probably the people you were referring to originally. It's women who self identity as leftists but don't really align with any leftist ideology. They just to do no work, benefit from what they would receive from a leftist political system if it existed, while paradoxically thinking they are better than everyone else and trying to build a new hierarchy with them at the top of the pyramid.
It's like how the ACLU is historically very leftist and in the past defended the KKK's freedom of speech. Now the ACLU is starting to fill up with these younger authoritarian, anti speech, fake leftists who try to ban people from saying incredibly mild takes about transgender people online.
[–]YJaewedwqewq 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (0 children)
Banning people from disagreeing with their current stage of cultural erosion is textbook leftism, as is hypocritically claiming to be working for "equality" while making conditions far worse.
So yes, these people and liberals in general are extremely leftist, unless your definition of leftism discounts every single historical application of Leftism.
view the rest of the comments →
[–]Q-Continuum-kin 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - (5 children)
[–]YJaewedwqewq 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (4 children)
[–]Q-Continuum-kin 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (3 children)
[–]YJaewedwqewq 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (2 children)
[–]Q-Continuum-kin 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (1 child)
[–]YJaewedwqewq 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)