all 14 comments

[–]LtGreenCo 12 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 0 fun13 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I'd be using that question to help me weed out the abusive parents.

[–]hfxB0oyADon't piss on my head & tell me it's raining. 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Just came here to say that. Track those motherfuckers.

[–]Alienhunter糞大名 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah I agree.

This is just an option on a form. Gives an option for the social worker to tick in for the crazy parents they won't be aware of.

Then in the future we've got a list of kids whose parents are abusive. As the public consciousness surrounding this issue evolves and people come to realize how rediculous and stupid it is, who is to say that 10 years from now having such a list won't be useful for prosecuting the parents?

[–]Adventurous_Ad6212 6 insightful - 6 fun6 insightful - 5 fun7 insightful - 6 fun -  (2 children)

excuse me? baby? dont you mean "is your Theyby Nonbinary?" fucking nazi dog whistles i swear. Stop adding to the plight of the trans Theybies.

[–]ClassroomPast6178 6 insightful - 5 fun6 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

Those poor, poor trans theybies. No one ever thinks of them!

It’s a transtheybycide! JK Rowling wants them dead!

[–]LyingSpirit472 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Um, eckscuse me, but even the very concept of this is a dog whistle that is literally killing more trans theybies than Hitler, JK Rowling, and Dave Chappelle combined. Don't they realize there should be no other options than 'nonbinary' on their paperwork, as these theybies cannot speak and thus cannot say their gender identity yet? I thought someone who works to preserve the queer race and have a future for trans theybies would understand the problem.

Do better, Venmo me, flagellate yourself.

[–]ClassroomPast6178 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Ahh they’re fucking inconsistent yet again.

The whole argument around the trans/non-binary bullshit is that it is internal and unobservable by others - otherwise there would be no fucking argument about it. So how the fuck would the parents know that their newborn baby is anything other than their “gender assigned at birth”?

Claiming anything different does nothing but highlight that this bullshit around babies, and let’s be honest, children in general, is down to the parents’ (and we know which parent is generally responsible) narcissistic desire for attention. It’s no fucking coincidence that Munchausen-by-proxy is largely a female disorder and the transing of children is largely female-led. The deluded mothers have just found the right intersection of woke ideology that covers their demented desire to gain attention through hurting their children.

This is something that now needs to be pushed heavily, it has to be pushed into the public consciousness - it is a far greater scandal than any male in a women’s prison or sport, this is society fucking celebrating the abuse of children. These parents need to stop being lauded and must now be exposed as the monsters each and every one of them is.

[–]LyingSpirit472 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

While you're right, the "attention" thing might be less than the endgame for "men are worthless and literally, inherently evil, but women are perfect and deserve everything they could ever want" in society for years.

If you're a parent, you WILL likely inevitably love your child more than anything- and hearing "your boy child is literally, inherently evil, it is destined to be a racist homophobic transphobic rapist and there is literally nothing you can do that will ever change that, it's the child's destiny- an inescapable fate foretold by the stars in the sky", then inevitably you'd want the one way out of this that puts them at the top of Oppression Olympics and will get them everything they ever want in life.

Likewise, if you're a woman who's been told forever that you deserve everything your heart desires by fiat, and you decided "I want a pretty little girl who'll grow up to be my best friend", and you end up with a boy, the entitled nature would be "If I don't get to birth my pretty little girl, I'll make one after the fact."

[–]GraviHeel Hortler 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

What's next? They gonna ask the baby it's gender? At best it'll say "WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH", but that's just indicating that it's alive, not an answer.

We best hope they don't start cutting the genitals off right at birth, but a certain ethnic group has already been mutilating them, not only them, but another ethnic group does too.

[–]Alienhunter糞大名 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I'm curious how they would bother to develop a metric for objectively "gendering" a baby.

If it has a penis it's a boy, if it doesn't it's a girl. Seems the most practical way of visually sexing a child.

Are we going to take the child and give them a toy truck and a doll and whichever they go for first makes them a boy or a girl? Or non-binary if they go for neither. We going to have a blue ball and a pink ball and a tungsten cube, and let the baby choose?

Perhaps we will see a babies preference for sucking at the tits of mother to be an indication that the child identifies as a woman.

[–]LyingSpirit472 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Sadly, even if I was joking in a different response, inevitably it's going to be "all babies are to be considered nonbinary until such time as they learn how to speak and can tell people their gender identity themselves."

[–]Alienhunter糞大名 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

My understanding of the word "non-binary" is that it essentially is a meaningless term that can apply to everyone regardless. It means different things to different people. Some see it as a statement that they don't conform entirely to their gender rolls, ok, congratulations you are like everyone else on the planet that isn't some weird idiot who thinks boys can only do "boy things" or that girls can only do "girl things" no matter even trying to argue what is what.

Others see it as some weird third gender option. I don't identify as a male or a female? Ok what do you identify as? I identify as not that? Ok. I identify as not being a table, does that make me non-table? Perhaps I identify as not being un-identifiable, does that make me a super identity? Or perhaps I identify as hydrophobic, does that mean I can go outside without getting wet?

It's all nonsense really. Like a Dr Seuss nursery rhyme.

Still, I think it's fine to have a place on the form for parents to put down "non binary" since you know parents are gonna do that anyway, and well, if we list em up we have documentation in the future if these kids ever want to sue them. You gonna argue that a baby has a gender identity in 20 years? Will it even be a thing? Somewhat doubt it.

I think the real question that comes into play is, why have sex boxes to check at all (a serious question for me, outside of medical realms, it seems like there isn't really a particularly strong reason for the government to bother with that information on ID.

[–]LyingSpirit472 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Um, eckscuse me, WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHgender is valid and perfectly acceptable, as many SJWs prove in life.

[–]UncleWillard56 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That's the price you pay for singing up to be in the system. They immediately want to take away certain rights from you at the onset. Look at the form. You can't just identify your child by their biological sex. They're not even giving you the choice NOT to play that stupid language game.