you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Musky༼⁠ ⁠つ⁠ ⁠◕⁠‿⁠◕⁠ ⁠༽⁠つ 🐈 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

because it shows institutions are starting to lose their fear of the lgbT lobbyists and listen to opposing viewpoints.

I think they're fearing the backlash from the public and even lawmakers, but there's massive amount of money in pandering to ESG / DEI / TRAs. This isn't and never was an organic movement. This is rich billionaires trying to normalize their or their kid's deviance with propagandists and bots online, and useful idiots pick up the cause for free.

It makes sense, what do you get a billionaire who has everything? You try to get people to stop making fun of you for cross dressing and diddling children. Try to destigmatize kink. When they talk about people living their "authentic lives," and being their "true selves," it isn't about Johnny down the street who wishes he was a girl, it's so people like Jennifer Pritzker can stop hiding. They're rich and powerful and more important than us pleebs, must be galling to have to hide in fear of being called out.

The kids are now hearing the detrans stories and wondering if maybe, just maybe, they aren't really meant to be a different gender, and realizing that they couldn't change it anyways. The detransitioners are feeling misled, used. There's a lot of resentment. Slowly you seem to be able to get away with more and more criticism.

[–]Newzok 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Bingo. Much of our public discourse is the work of billionaire interest. I suppose ESG/DEI works to change things, but only for so long. I can't wait to see the dam break.