Not a single human on Earth sincerely believes that this person is a woman

submitted by [deleted] from (twitter.com)

all 22 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]alladd 17 insightful - 2 fun17 insightful - 1 fun18 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

It's weird, isn't it? We all know he's a dude, but there are some people who will literally go apoplectic with rage if you don't participate in social etiquette word salad and pretend to not have a basic grasp of reality so he can have a more satisfying jerk-off session later.

[–]ClassroomPast6178 13 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 0 fun14 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Its postmodernism isn’t it? Don’t postmodernists believe that language literally constructs reality and therefore saying the hairy dude is a dainty schoolgirl makes it actually true and anyone who denies it is not only denying reality but committing a violent act against the “dainty schoolgirl” by denying their existence, thus justifying the kind of response (physical and rhetorical) that used to be reserved for actual physical violence.

They’ve taken the Emperor’s New Clothes and completely misunderstood the morals it is trying to convey.

[–]alladd 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

I think whatever school of thought it coincidentally resembles is a post-hoc rationalization of good old fashioned denial. People just need some kind of framework to justify their insane thoughts otherwise they'd have to admit they were delusional.

[–]ClassroomPast6178 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There’s definitely a line from postmodern theory to queer theory to men in dresses demanding to be called women.

It’s the intersection of fetish and philosophy.

We are starting to see it spread to other degeneracies, look at the nuclear waste czar and his catalogue of degeneracy, which the media was only too happy to normalise. Look at the fucking police posing for pictures with men in leather dog masks during Pride parades, or the fact that the progressives are trying really fucking hard to get kids involved in drag.

Look how quickly it changed from “we must tolerate” to “we must celebrate”. I fully believe that LGB deserve equal rights, but it’s time they also agreed that that comes with some responsibility, one of which is keeping the degenerate shit in private spaces and away from children, just like the straights should do too.

I don’t think that that’s asking much.

[–]OuroborosTheory 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

that's from studies on the role of categories in thought--some cultures "construct" sexuality as either same- vs. opposite-sex; others as top vs. bottom, and you wouldn't really be able to "think your way out" of those "natural" categories until someone told you about alternative ones (like how "bi" became popular in the 70s)

that's why people in Latin America don't like being forced into the very different US-based categories like "queer" or "trans"; it'd be like asking if Oda Nobunaga was a Democrat or a Republican

then a bunch of college sophomores half-remember all this, the hivemind makes it mandatory, and they start writing up lists of demands for the blindsided administratium

ironically post-2012 identity politics (however you want to call it) is really really insistent on the sheer OBjectivity of whatever someone insists they think, which goes against what the Frenchies were saying (hon hon hon)

[–]ClassroomPast6178 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

What’s the bet that this guy has a “history”?

[–]LordoftheFliesAmeri-kin 2.0. Pronouns: MegaWhite/SuperStraight/UltraPatriarchy 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Sorry, but I don't like losing money on sucker bets.

[–]IMissPorn 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I donno... honestly it's kind of hard to tell when someone is that fat.

[–]BISH 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

That's clearly not a woman.

Some could make a reasonable argument that is also not a man.

We need some specific new words for these anthropoids. This one is probably one of those cake genders.

[–]SMCAB 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Well the "news" is calling it a she. So does it matter?

The answer is no.

[–]clownworlddropout 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Friendly reminder that "identify as" is the same as "pretend to be" and should be treated as such.

[–]ClassroomPast6178 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Nail on head!

[–]jet199 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

How does he manage to step sideways every time and not end up doing the splits?

[–]UncleWillard56 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Or totally human, lol. Sasquatch are real!

[–]LordoftheFliesAmeri-kin 2.0. Pronouns: MegaWhite/SuperStraight/UltraPatriarchy 1 insightful - 5 fun1 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 5 fun -  (3 children)

Bro, come on, you know Sasquatch isn't a sloppy-looking blob of meat like that. Fucker lives in the woods and is constantly evading hikers, after all, that's not a life conducive to being a butter golem. I mean, probably not a AAA-level Chad, not with that body hair and all, but definitely fit.

[–]UncleWillard56 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Maybe it's a trans-squatch? Identifying as human?

[–]LordoftheFliesAmeri-kin 2.0. Pronouns: MegaWhite/SuperStraight/UltraPatriarchy 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

If that's the case, it's no more successful in that than it was in identifying as a woman.

[–]OuroborosTheory 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aJphX1WtVSY

[–]Beneficial_Pear9705 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I don’t even know if that thing’s a person

[–]GraviHeel Hortler 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Surely this is a ʷᵒMAN.

[–]Femaleisnthateful 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Looks like a protege of Jessica "Wax My Balls" Yaniv.

[–]xoenix 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Listening to Matt say it is too funny.