you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]ClassroomPast6178 4 insightful - 7 fun4 insightful - 6 fun5 insightful - 7 fun -  (13 children)

They look like a right nightmare.

[–]Femaleisnthateful 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (11 children)

Ok so I assumed this was a transwoman. Instead it appears to be a Handmaiden. That whole Twitter feed is a nightmare.

[–]LtGreenCo 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (10 children)

I made the same assumption and even after looking through some of her social media I wasn't 100% certain. The hairline in particular is treading in male pattern baldness territory. But the hips eventually sold me.

Her focused hatred for alpha-males is telling though. I'm guessing she's been burned pretty badly by a man, and instead of moving on, she turned her heartbreak into an annoying feminist identity.

[–]wylanderuk 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (9 children)

she turned her heartbreak into an annoying feminist identity.

Just like the radfem you are replying to...

[–]LtGreenCo 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

I don't go through people's post history before I reply to them.

[–]wylanderuk 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Dude you don't have to, the username and the fact she called the other chick a handmaiden for fucks sake.

[–]Alienhunter糞大名 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Rad-fem or not when you're right you're right.

The crazy anti-social feminists may have been amongst the most vocal opponents of the trans ideological creep but again, on those aspects on which they are right, they are right.

Can only use this as an educational opportunity to point out that crazy poorly developed feminist theories and the like paved the way for queer theories and trans theories and all that, that the opposition to feminism was not one that was an opposition to women, or even an opposition to the furthering of women's equality in society, but rather an opposition to an illogical ideology that was driven more by emotion than practical concern.

I've always said that women and men will never truly achieve a social equality to the point of all salaries all social dynamics and all parts of society being equal. Simply because the biological differences between the sexes will put pressure on people to live certain ways. Women while pregnant and giving birth are more vulnerable than when they are not. Women have a higher risk of sexual assault simply because of the capacity for pregnancy. It's going to effect how people choose to live their lives. Even if we remove artificial legal barriers.

There's many old fashioned restrictions on women than now seem silly but simply blaming them on an oppressive patriarchy is a simplistic and extremely cynical understanding. This kind of laughably ironic binary thinking is an underlying issue behind most of these problematic social movements as they latch onto a novel but as of yet undeveloped idea and attempt to interpret all through the lense of oppressor vs oppressed.

We can rightly look at say, Arab countries today, and lament the difficulties that women face there and rightfully conclude that such societies have an equality problem. But we must also never forget to understand the practical aspect of these restrictive laws either. I knew some women who went out in bikinis (because they were stupid and didn't want to follow the "backwards" laws) in some Sharia law country, and they were promptly arrested by the religious police and deported.

The interesting thing is, that while extremely strict and obviously a rediculous law from our western perspective. Is not quite so rediculous when considered that from a local perspective, women dressing in such a manner are making themselves "available" in a country that doesn't share the enlightened western ideal of consent. And that the police getting to them first was by far the best possible outcome for what they did.

You can't really discuss this online or in any western space with feminists around because they will crucify you for even suggesting that how one dresses makes them a target. But in the world of what will actually happen vs the idealized version of what should happen. I agree that the women should have a right to dress how they wish, they however do not have that right in many countries, and bad things will happen to them if they flaunt them. This isn't a good thing but it is what it is. By that backwards logic these laws actually do "protect" women in a sense. Even though from a western perspective that seems rediculous.

The radfems then are really only the natural progression of any social movement as it goes towards the mainstream. Women achieved a great deal of social equality and freedom in the west (and good for them) but it's only that social equality and freedom that allows them to behave in socially transgressive ways and get away with it with relatively minor social consequences. It's part of the ironic truth that the ability to complain about ones lack of freedom is in and of itself an indication that one actually does not lack freedom at all.

[–]LtGreenCo 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Alright, so "FemaleIsntHateful" doesn't really scream radfem to me; it's kinda just nonsense. Like, who thinks females are all hateful? Who is this username trying to refute? Now if it was "MenAreHateful" then yeah I'd suspect a radfem. As for "handmaiden", the term means nothing to me colloquially. It could have been referring to dress style for all I know.

[–]wylanderuk 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Well shit, dyslexia strikes yet again...I somehow read it as "feminismisnthateful".

But yeah "handmaiden" along with "pick me" are classic radfem insults to women that disagree with them.

[–]Musky༼⁠ ⁠つ⁠ ⁠◕⁠‿⁠◕⁠ ⁠༽⁠つ 💛 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Terfs are useful allies against the trannies. And there's something kind of hot about them.

[–]wylanderuk 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I would refer you to the parable of the scorpion and the frog, but you might be to much into your submission fetish to understand it...

[–]Musky༼⁠ ⁠つ⁠ ⁠◕⁠‿⁠◕⁠ ⁠༽⁠つ 💛 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Oh lawdy, I don't want to submit to a terf, but deep down, I think they really all just want to be pretty princesses.

[–]YJaewedwqewq 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

"lol" said the scorpion, "lmao"

[–]clownworlddropout 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I took a peek at her feed, holy shit what a megalomaniac. Of course she'd demand an oh-so-special shitter.