I got a bit out of the humanities classes I took, although most of that was meeting some other students I got along with and privately discussing how fucking insane the teacher was afterwards. Though we pretty much more or less had our own alternative network of sorts to avoid the activist teachers and warn each other where we could.

Surprisingly diverse group honestly, turns out when you get a bunch of people who are basically just there to learn get their degree and move onto a career small details like differences of opinion on religion or politics matter so little in the face of the more pressing issues of having to eggshell step around whatever professors pet peeves and unfair grading scales were.

I had a few productive class discussions actually, including ones on trans women in sports surprisingly. Where the general consensus was, if you'll pardon my vary awkward wording. That there really wasn't anything of men's league and most men didn't care. If women, or trans women, their own personal identification being irrelevant, could qualify for the top league and play at the same level as the best men, they would. And since that was extremely rare the cause must be due to innate biological disadvantages in the specific context of whatever the game being played was. Usually sheer physical strength. So a female league in that sense is essentially a kind of "handicapped league" where the restriction in so that the people who share the "handicap" can play together in a fair way. No different than say, a league for blind people, a sighted person who wants to play on the blind league has an unfair advantage. A blind person who wants to play on the sighted league does not. The former is unsporting. The later, if the person can somehow compensate for the disability and compete, is essentially the essence of what sports are about. Even if it's utterly unrealistic and only a hypothetical discussion.

Naturally the one person who was screaming bloody murder at the idea that males are biologically stronger than females was the trans-masculine type, or so I assumed, I actually didn't bother to ask because frankly their identify was none of my business and they seemed like a bit of a cunt I'd rather not deal with, surprisingly accurate assumption, and hilarious total disregard for facts like a child sticking their fingers in their ears.

How dare you say men are stronger than women!!!!!

Here's a chart of top Olympic running times segregated by gender. Here's a huge gap.

"PATRIARCHY!"

Here's a chart showing various muscle mass measurements of males and females and here's another chart showing the muscle mass of people who are taking cross sex hormones and we can see a definite gap that is consistent with biological sex that is not totally diminished regardless of hormone use.

"BIGOT lalalalalala"

Scary stuff. Don't know what happened to that person of indeterminate pronouns. I assume they failed out due to mental health issues at some point they kind of dropped off my radar. Kinda like the weird Pikachu obsessed Lesbian who communicated only in Pokemon noises. Weird person. Didn't hate her I rather enjoyed the rediculous hilarious approach to social relations. Although if you are answering the teachers question by saying "Piiiikaaachuuu" unfortunately that's not a recognized disability and you won't get credits. Think she lasted two semesters, very impressive.