you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]cephyrious 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

If you ask any old, conservative person if men can become women or vice versa you will be laughed at. The main emboldening issue for the whole trans ideology is that before the 1950s, if you asked any old, conservative person if black people should have the exact same rights as white people, or if men should be able to marry men, you would get the same response. So obviously, since the world has accepted that racism and homophobia are morally wrong (and I agree), they just assume that it is the same regressive attitude they need to overcome this time. They are morally right, and history will prove it, they think. But the problem is that they are not making a moral claim, like previous civil rights groups did. They are making a claim about reality, and we have more objective ways to determine the truth of reality claims. And those ways are pretty much not agreeing with them in any way, shape or form.

[–]RedEyedWarriorThe Evil Cishomo 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That was why I accepted transgenderism a few years ago. I thought it was just another step after accepting universal suffrage, people of various races being friends, interracial marriages and gay marriage. I thought that people who were against transgenderism were simply ignorant or bigoted. Turns out, there is a difference between correcting a problem that was once accepted by society, and trying to change reality, which is pretty much inventing a new problem. In fact, some of the changes we’ve made in the past might have been a mistake. For the record, I am glad that interracial marriage is legal, that same sex relationships between consenting adults are legal, and that a woman can start her own bank account without approval from her husband, her father or her brother. But I also believe that letting everyone vote was a mistake. And I sometimes question if legalising same sex marriage was a good idea when we could have just gotten rid of inheritance taxes and make it a legal right for cohabitants to visit their partners in hospitals and attend their funerals. Especially considering that a growing number of opposite sex couples in my country don’t bother getting married. In fact, Ireland no longer requires the father to marry the mother of his children to legally claim them, as those children are legally his once he’s been living with the mother for 12 months. Although I think that is still dumb, because a paternity test should be enough to get the father all of the rights to his child, even if he’s not living with the mother.