SEXUALITYThey’ve been open about it for a long time, they’re coming for your children. Drag Queens in classrooms.

submitted by ClassroomPast6178 from tandfonline.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]alladd 15 insightful - 1 fun15 insightful - 0 fun16 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

In the USA, for example, many people learn that the most valued boy will be white, engage in rough-and-tumble play with other boys that will toughen him up and straighten him out, allowing him to mature into a man who wears a suit and tie, makes a lot of money, enters into a sexually monogamous marriage with a woman, buys a home, and has enough but not too many children.

Someone sounds jealous. It's okay, don't cry. Just convince kids to dress up like perverts too, and then you'll be the normal ones!

[–]ClassroomPast6178[S] 14 insightful - 3 fun14 insightful - 2 fun15 insightful - 3 fun -  (5 children)

Translation:

“We want the white males to be effeminate, non-straight, fetish-possessed crossdressers who are sexually incontinent, preferably with older men, poor, single, childless and vulnerable.”

Well slap my ass and call me Sally, that sure sounds like grooming!

[–]alladd 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

It actually honestly feels more like they have no idea what they want, or what they purport "queer theory" to even be. It's an idea with a void at its center because it doesn't develop from anything but the libido and has no end goal beyond sex. So all this political framework is just them trying to convince themselves it's legitimate and not the post-hoc rationalizing of a mentally unwell fetishist. That it ends with grooming, mutilation and other abuses are just consolation prizes of living a directionless narcissistic lie of a life.

[–]ClassroomPast6178[S] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I thought “queer theory” was essentially an argument for the breakdown of all norms of behaviour, particularly sexual, and because they view sexuality as socially constructed they believe that heterosexuality (and homosexuality, for that matter) is just a learned behaviour. It’s ultimately extremely creepy, but consistent with the ideology, that they have fixated on “queering” children. It also helps that at least one of their founders, Foucault, was a paedophile who raped little boys and wrote in support of the elimination of the age of consent (alongside many of the great and the good of 60s/70s France).

[–]alladd 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Right, I think because it comes from the libido it focuses on sex primarily, but when you really look at it as a whole, "queer theory" is just sophistry. It's just being able to undermine any system or behavior that you don't like with linguistic tricks in order to avoid confronting the pathologies that led to you becoming who you are.

Because any kind of established base of common knowledge lends itself to criticizing such a blatantly narcissistic view, that common knowledge needs to be challenged. In lieu of changing one's perspective to meet facts, the only other option is to inject doubt into the ability to ascertain fact.

Whatever the queer person's personal failures are in life; those become the spaces they fuck up because they wanted to be welcomed into them. Ironically they still seek acceptance from a larger outside group, they are in no way individualistic; they just try to change the criteria for acceptance to be whatever list of traits they possess, rather than working on themselves.

TL;DR don't over-respect them by acting like this ideology has a point. This is just another way of trying to fit in.

[–]Dragonerne 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They're anti white and they want whites to be genocided. That's the ultimate goal. "Don't have children. Cut your dick off."

[–]LyingSpirit472 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's an idea with a void at its center because it doesn't develop from anything but the libido and has no end goal beyond sex.

But that's the whole point of their theory: It doesn't have to have an end goal to the person espousing it besides sex. The whole theory becomes "I'll say or do literally whatever gets my pee-pee wet, to literally whoever will allow me to get my pee pee wet inside them, until such time as my pee pee is wet."