Evil paedophile who committed more than 1,000 sex crimes and planned to turn a Thai orphanage into a child abuse den is allowed to live unsupervised after transitioning to a woman

submitted by jet199 from dailymail.co.uk

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]RedEyedWarriorThe Evil Cishomo 9 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 2 fun -  (10 children)

Western Australia has fallen.

Child molesters should be given the death penalty.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

I am not sure about the death penalty. I think there’s levels to child abuse.

[–]jet199[S] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

Yeah, the level they can get away with at the time.

Next time they might not be so restricted

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

What do you do with an adult fucking a 17 year old. Let’s say a 35 year old. Then a 28 year old. Then a 24 year old.

Now let me add in that the 35 year old and 28 year old met the girl through normal means, like worked together. Both live and cherish the younger girl and would like to marry and support her for the rest of their life.

The 24 year old and 17 year old are equally in love. 24 is not quit established yet.

Now switch the sex’s. What about if it’s the same scanario but the older one is a women. But she just wants to fuck him and move on.

Next scenario.

What if it’s like a rapper, and a 15 year old that was in a 21 year and older club?

What if it’s not a pedofile, like, for whatever reason, there’s a sleep over, and it’s like a 9 year old girl who gets assaulted, but the guy was on that crazy night time sleeping drug, that shit rosanne was on when she said that racist shit.

Or even drinking was involved, and the person is normally a good person, but was not, one time.

I’m not giving these scenarios my blessing, like it’s okay. But could you share your opinion on these hypotheticals.

Like what is your rule for these things. When it’s not just clean cut, old man forcefully taking advantage of a little girl or boy.

Do you think these people deserve to be raped in jail.

[–]ClassroomPast6178 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

You have judges, they’re supposed to weigh mitigating and aggravating factors when sentencing, not to mention, prosecutorial discretion too.

The fact is the Common Law court system has a fairly decent set of tools available for sorting through all the factors of an offender’s offending and as long as they are used there’s not much to say about any of your examples, a judge would be able to decide upon receipt of a guilty verdict from a jury. A sensible prosecutor might opt for not trying certain cases, based on the facts available.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

Yea. That’s a great point.

I’m saying should we kill these people?

[–]jet199[S] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

Maybe use them for landmine clearance

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I mean, I’d pay to see that.

[–]Airbus320 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Vulptex come here quick

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Don’t do it man. It was a question. I swear I get shunned by Vulptex every hour. And I’m trying to follow the rules

[–]ClassroomPast6178 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Well no. I’m anti-death penalty, I only play a Woodchipper operator on TV.