Uhmmmm… where does it say disabled people can’t marry?

submitted by BenitoGreen99 from (i.imgur.com)

all 27 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]Femaleisnthateful 18 insightful - 2 fun18 insightful - 1 fun19 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

I wonder if this is some groomer trying to marry a severely mentally disabled woman who can't give consent, and is pissed off that he can't get what he wants?

Also, 'disabled' is becoming as meaningless a term as 'trans', so it's hard to know what is being said here.

[–]LordoftheFliesAmeri-kin 2.0. Pronouns: MegaWhite/SuperStraight/UltraPatriarchy 14 insightful - 1 fun14 insightful - 0 fun15 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Also, 'disabled' is becoming as meaningless a term as 'trans', so it's hard to know what is being said here.

I'm wondering if his brain just spat this out automatically, with absolutely no stop to check what was being said first. Just flipped through a mental rolodex of "oppressed" groups, found one that hadn't been mentioned enough recently, and just plugged it into the appropriate blanks then hit 'post'.

[–]IMissPorn 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Ah! Thanks for figuring it out. At first I just took it as an incel thing: "boo-hoo I'm a cripple and no one will fuck me." But no, this is what they meant: "retards can't consent".

For what it's worth, this is legitimately a tricky issue. Nobody wants to see the mentally disabled taken advantage of, but at the same time it's unfair to put them in the same category as children, because A) they're not getting any smarter; this is their whole life and B) they may well have a normal adult sex drive and wanna get down and dirty as much as any of us.

[–]LyingSpirit472 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

por que no los dos?

It could be "retards can't consent" AND "boo hoo I'm a cripple and no one will fuck me", or some mix of the two to "I'm crippled and my only chance is someone so retarded they'll think I'm a catch."

[–]alladd 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

pretty sure this is a girl cosplaying as her favorite gay manga boy, thus the NB identity and awkwardly masculine-yet-still-boyish "Danny"

[–]Datachost 13 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 0 fun14 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Is this like that weird "trans people can't marry" shit, where they're making out that not being able to marry on their exact terms means they're not allowed to get married?

[–]fuck_redditThou/Thee/Thy 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This was my first thought: that since people don’t equally want to marry a disables person, then there is not “marriage equality” for disabled people…

[–]loubag1997 10 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

“Marriage” as if these degenerates give a fuck about any marriage, lmao

Marriage is dead, it’s just a legal contract now.

[–]jet199 10 insightful - 4 fun10 insightful - 3 fun11 insightful - 4 fun -  (4 children)

These troons just want to use marriage to trap someone in a relationship with them. They know full well their chances of finding a willing partner.

[–]FlyingKangaroo 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

They hate marriage when it’s a straight one (and especially with a religious background) but will praise this concept when referring to their own groups, as if it’s suddenly something brave and stunning.

[–]CleverFoolOfEarthI'm not crazy, my headmates told me I'm perfectly sane! 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

I mean, religion plays zero into it, but straight marriage legit shouldn't be a thing, because straight relationships as a whole but especially in-person straight relationships shouldn't be a thing. Men and women on average think so differently that it's like deer and dogs trying to cohabitate, both social animals but interact too differently to understand eachother fully, it simply isn't a basis for a lasting or even meaningful relationship, and to make matters worse, humans are sexually dimorphic to the point that the strength gap between strong females and weak males, let alone averages, is so high that mixed-sex intercourse can never be consensual, even if the woman initiates it's still only situationally-coerced assent, which is meaningless in sexual situations.

[–]jet199 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

People have been getting married and living together for the rest of their lives for thousands of years, but because you failed, the whole concept can't work.

Seems legit

[–]CleverFoolOfEarthI'm not crazy, my headmates told me I'm perfectly sane! 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I never failed, I deliberately avoid it on philosophical grounds having seen what it did to my parents (made them into a pair of bitter dickweasels), to their married friends (see first entry), and my Uncle Jimmy and Aunt Caroline (ended in a bunch of arguments and a messy divorce that was bad for the kids). Only happy, stable couple I've ever encountered or even heard of, at least in the West (I have had my arguments countered by people from other cultures, so maybe men and women are more similar outside of America, I wouldn't know, I only ever lived in America) is two lesbians who were dating all through high school. Men and women are simply too different to form stable relationships. Like I said before, it's like deer and dogs.

[–]clownworlddropout 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Maybe not an equality of outcome, but certainly an equality of opportunity. What does Danny Queer propose? Government mandated handicapped marriage quotas?

[–]ClassroomPast6178 5 insightful - 10 fun5 insightful - 9 fun6 insightful - 10 fun -  (1 child)

Okay, Clownworlddropout the computer is matching you with…let’s see here..ah yes, Barry the Potato. Congratulations, by the power invested in me by the Equal Marriage Outcome Act 2028, you’re married!

Few things you should know about Barry, he’s a bit of a biter and you should try to ignore the ear on his chin..don’t worry you’ll get used to the smell.

[–]Musky༼⁠ ⁠つ⁠ ⁠◕⁠‿⁠◕⁠ ⁠༽⁠つ 🐈 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

don’t worry you’ll get used to the smell.

So few women appreciate a good musk.

[–]FlyingKangaroo 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I think that faggot is referring to the issue that people with some severe disabilities (let’s say, Down syndrome) or things like schizophrenia might not be allowed to marry or someone else will have a right to divorce them (in a case when someone hides mental illness and it’s revealed later). But mostly the issue with getting married. However, that exists for a reason. At the same time I don’t hear people on wheelchairs bitching that they can’t marry.

Disabled people can have sex outside marriage of course but I assume such difficulties (not in all cases - only in some of them) exist to potentially prevent from passing severe disabilities to children, at least that’s something I always heard. However, there are cases when someone was reluctant to give a marriage and it happened anyway, depends on country and law.

But queer idiots will equal disabilities to fancy sexual buzzwords. Ironic considering how the trans thing is akin to amputee fetishism.

[–]Alienhunter糞大名 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

To be fair a lot of disabled people end up becoming bitter incel types that nobody would want to marry anyway.

There's plenty of disabled people who are nice friendly and not terrible people to be around either, and they'll usually find someone eventually, but the assholes are just insufferable, yes you can get away with being a jerk on the bus or whatever because most people won't fuck with the guy in the wheelchair, I won't, but I'll definitely insult you from a distance since I can outrun you. Unless of course you're just a normal nice person then I'll go out of my way to help you. It's just that simple.

[–]FlyingKangaroo 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I believe the problem arises when someone uses disability as an excuse to be mean to everyone else because of “duh, ableism!!1!”. I agree, plenty of disabled people are nice, just like others (the difference being health issues) and some (including those of SJW type) become insufferable.

[–]Adventurous_Ad6212 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

Imagine seeing two people who are disabled from the waist down having a Fucking cripple wedding that's disgusting. Eww.

[–]Alienhunter糞大名 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

You can't even walk down the aisle you sick perverted bastard.

God cast Adam and Eve out of the garden and they ran out, he didn't wheel them out.

[–]Haylstorm 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If I'm taking this with a huuuuuuge grain of salt it might be referring to the fact that disabled people often lose benefits when they get married so some legit can't afford to lose those, so no marriage for them?

Even then though you can still get married, but with how these lot argue they'd probably say that not giving them the benefits after is genocide or something.

[–]JasonCarswellSisyphus / Ouroboros 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

"Be marry and gay" does not mean "to get married".
Inability to comprehend is not a disability.

[–]alladd 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

She's obviously referring to the disability that prevents certain people from being able to be hit with rice.

A staple of any happy wedding, this cruel culinary tradition has kept too many disabled and trans-abled bodies from marital bliss for far too long.

[–]wipeyournose 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

marriage equality

That's another jew ruse. They don't want equality because they already have it. Tell me how a gay man has any different marriage laws than a straight man? Either of them can marry a woman, neither can marry a man. That's fucking equality.

What they have succeed to do is to give faggots special marriage privilege.

[–]artetolife 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I did some digging to find out what she's talking about and it seems like disabled Americans lose entitlement to some kind of welfare when they get married - see this article

It has nothing whatsoever to do with same sex marriage equality, they're just riding the coattails of a more popular cause and shaming those cis gays to boot, seeing as how we're supposed to use our mountains of privelege to fight everyone else's battles for them.

[–]jet199 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

If you have a partner who can work you get less tax payer's money.

Such oppression