you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]LtGreenCo 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Agreed and there's nothing wrong with the original question. "What is a woman" is nice and succinct, and has a proven track-record at making TRA's short-circuit on the spot. There's no answer to that question that's logically consistent with their ideology. The BEST they've come up with is an incoherent lexically illegal definition.

[–]LyingSpirit472 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Agreed. Again, people even asking the question have to realize that the question is trying to ask a "you're caught, redhanded, you have to admit you're not a woman" question to people who quite literally view transgenderism as their religion.

As such, people also have to realize that the response you will get to these questions will be the same as if you asked a religious person about something wrong in the Bible- not even something that's best described as mythology, but even something that has been conclusively proven false in the Bible like, for example, "The Bible says Pi equals EXACTLY 3." In that instance, the religious believer will clutch to "the Lord works in mysterious ways", or "well, it's obvious this is true because the Bible said it, maybe your claim Pi= 3.14... is a falsehood Satan made up to discredit God", or "well, I know it's true so it's true"...anything they can think of to make them sleep at night knowing they're right to believe their religion will happen.