you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Newzok 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Of course it's a danger hair starting shit. Why are they always women though.

[–]RamblingOtter 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Women are by nature more nurturing than men. Women are also more susceptible to societal pressures than men. Thus, once you have women thinking one way, others follow quickly. Given the natural competitiveness of people and how women compete, the whole thing is a race to the bottom in one huge, pink-haired androgynous neurotic noise.

To get to the children, you have to get to the women. To get to the women you have to dismember their support and safety structures. To do that, you have to get to men. What are mens' biggest weakness? Their women. Fuck up their women, everything else follows. Women are the key to a civilised society. You fuck them up, you get everything.

There is a reason that women are the most highly praised and regarded in any historical society whether they exist or not. There is a reason it's women - and THEN children - first. There is a reason that acts of Prima Noctis (right of the first night) has been employed throughout history, whether it was the British against the Scottish or Irish, France, China, the history is replete with examples of attempts to breed out entire societies by insisting the nearest lord or righteous person has the first night with any new bride.

That's why it's always women. They are the means to an end. Men have already been rendered powerless through feminism, white men especially so. Given white women cannot reasonably en-masse get support or strength from men, they are open to attack from any ideology that insists on being on the right side of life. Supported by the media and backed up by organisations, women have long eschewed the ideas of raising families or playing any part in healthy procreation or even allowing others to do so if they genuinely don't feel maternal.

By targeting kids now and disabling any future sexual potential, you are ending a species.

This is prima noctis before the first night is even possible.

[–]Newzok 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I take your point and it rings true. I'm not sure about ending a species, but certainly it's a hack to manipulate the masses and get things through.

[–]RamblingOtter 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Oh I'm sure we're not talking genocide here. Well, I guess it depends on which ugly man in a dress you talk to I suppose.

I'm just exhibiting how women are the key. They are the target and always have been. They are just acting out based upon the misinformation they have been fed through the hardened eyes they got through feminism.

Have you dated anytime in the last ten years? Finding a woman who is not a militant feminist is astoundingly difficult. And usually they only realise too late that they are undate-able, or the men they are actually with are not what they want, usually unmasculine milquetoasts with no identity unless it's approved by her. And they will still double-down on the feminism.

All of these causal effects are coming about right now. The women are the key. They always have been. Now they have come for the women and the men cannot help.

Do you want proof? It's simple: "Shut up, Karen!"

[–]Newzok 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Oh I notice as well. Shit's unhinged but opinions are entirely surface level, which you notice if you try to go in-depth. The trouble is, I think, that women know that the radfem/woke rhetoric is kind of just for show, a way to fit in, opinion as jewelry. But men do not realise this and take their word for it. And then you get endless drama.