all 35 comments

[–][deleted] 28 insightful - 4 fun28 insightful - 3 fun29 insightful - 4 fun -  (2 children)

I've been following this story since it started making the rounds on social media over the weekend. On Monday, it was the lead on matt walsh's show. It was also featured in the Daily Mail and a few other outlets.

This dude clearly is getting off on this crap. Oh here, somebody said a few days ago that this teacher is doing more to red-pill Canadians than anything JK Rowling could tweet. The image of those knockers is a powerful visual of what AGP fuckery is all about.

There's a really cool gender critical youtuber in the Toronto area, Arty Morty. I just checked his twitter to see what he thinks about all this.
he tweeted:

Lemieux's Law: If you create an opportunity for men to express extreme fetishes out in the open with impunity, some of them will take it.

Lemieux is the name this man is going by now. The only edit I would make to Arty's tweet would be to change the word opportunity to opportroonity.

[–]jet199 22 insightful - 2 fun22 insightful - 1 fun23 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

The troons are the best argument against their own ideas.

The main thing to do to stop them is to repeat their own words and broadcast their actions far and wide.

That's why they hate Libs of Tiktok so much.

[–]LordoftheFliesAmeri-kin 2.0. Pronouns: MegaWhite/SuperStraight/UltraPatriarchy 16 insightful - 1 fun16 insightful - 0 fun17 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That's why they hate Libs of Tiktok so much.

And KiwiFarms, more recently.

[–]ClassroomPast6178 24 insightful - 2 fun24 insightful - 1 fun25 insightful - 2 fun -  (16 children)

The school is defending a teacher practicing a sexual fetish in front of children. Actual child abuse is occurring and the school is defending it.

Vile and disgusting.

[–]FlyingKangaroo 17 insightful - 2 fun17 insightful - 1 fun18 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

Exactly. If for example a straight man who doesn’t call himself trans would come with a giant fake penis, everyone would be angry (rightfully). But somehow trans people get a free pass for their perverse actions.

[–]alladd 21 insightful - 1 fun21 insightful - 0 fun22 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

or a fucking actual real woman who showed up with no bra and her nipples sticking out would get in trouble too

[–][deleted] 9 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Women need to highlight this point with immediate action. Free the Nipple!

[–]Vulptexghost fox girl ^w^ 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I don't know about that, pedo teachers who literally have sex with their students rarely get more than a slap on the wrist if they're female.

[–]Alienhunter糞大名 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I mean if a woman shows up with giant fake prosthetic tits I very much doubt they'd be given a pass. Why should a trans woman be treated any differently?

I'd argue the mere act of wearing giant fucking fake tits is a form of sexual harassment and contributes to a toxic environment so the school must take action or else they are complicit. If I was a student here I'd be filing sexual harassment complaints about the teacher daily. The way she dresses makes me uncomfortable. I feel like I'm sexually harassed just by looking at the pictures. This goes far beyond mere gender expression.

[–]jet199 16 insightful - 2 fun16 insightful - 1 fun17 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Because people are scared of them.

If you look at every group who get a free pass that's the only one thing they all have in common.

There are loads of under-privileged minority groups which get shat on by everyone because no one is scared of them turning up at their house with a pipe bomb.

[–]Enemycupcake 17 insightful - 1 fun17 insightful - 0 fun18 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You're not even allowed to point out that not agreeing with transgender stuff can be hazardous either. Just yesterday there was a front page thread on Ask Reddit with thousands of replies. The question was what is going to be a dangerous thing to say in 2023, and lots of people were answering anything against gender identity stuff with even more agreeing with them. This morning the entire thread was removed, not just the comments that you can't talk about gender ideology, but the whole damn thing. I can't think of any reason they would do that besides there being too many comments for them to delete without calling attention to the fact that they're blatantly censoring popular opinions they dislike.

[–]Alienhunter糞大名 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

If a trans man came to work with an oversized dildo I can't imagine it being taken well either.

This story is just so absolutely bizzare. I still think it's so crazy it might be fake. But if it's not I question how the fuck it's allowed? Are women allowed to wear fucking massive prosthetic breasts? I'd say no though I doubt anyone has tried it before. If I was the principal I'd nix this shit outright and claim I'd do the same if a real woman was trying the same shit.

[–]ClassroomPast6178 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I’d say it’s happening because no one dares be the person to draw the line for fear of being on the wrong side of history.

We are going to allow dudes who claim to be women to use women’s toilets, we can’t ban prosthetic breasts because a dude who claims they’re a woman wears them to express their womanness, we can’t police the size of the prosthetic breasts, we aren’t allowed to tell women how they should dress at work, this is a woman, error, error, Daisy, Daisy, givemeyouranswerdoooooooooooo

[–]Alienhunter糞大名 11 insightful - 2 fun11 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

If allowing blatant sexual harassment is the right side of history then I want to be on the wrong side.

[–]1-800-FUCKOFF 11 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 0 fun12 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Their own hands are tied by their ideology. It would be downright ridiculous to entertain the possibility that a grown adult in a positition of authority at that school thinks any of that shit is fine. But what are they gonna do? Tell that troon that she's being inappropriate? Who are they to tell him that his massive fake tits, which he'll argue are part of his identity as a woman, are not OK?

These imbeciles and their ideology is the living embodiment of the concept of slippery slope. It's not always a logical fallacy.

You beed well-defined rules and laws. The idea that nobody will try to abuse good faith loose rules that are put in place for regular, well-meaning individuals is naive. Anyone older than 25 should have enough life experience to know that people abusing loose conventions and rules is going to be a big problem. Yet, for years, these idiot activists have been trying to convince the public that there are no perverts in the trans community, that nobody is going to sexually assault women in their own bathrooms, or abuse the idea that you can just pick your own gender to be put in a women's prison and rape them, or use the pretense of trying to educate kids in order to groom them and talk yo them about sex and gender because it makes their girldicks hard. Now that trans shit is more mainstream, you can't go a week without one of these fucking things happening on the national stage.

[–]Alienhunter糞大名 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I'll propose an alternative theory. This guy isn't trans. He's pretending to be because he is trying to get fired and get a big payout.

[–]LyingSpirit472 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

While I like the concept of the theory, if they were trying the Mr. Garrison method here, then they wouldn't try claiming gender identity here simply because it's risen to a trans person being able to do literally anything they want and they won't be fired. Showing up with huge fake tits bouncing around nothing, this person could rape their class in Macy's window and the school would name them Teacher of the Year and expel all the students for rejecting their sexuality by refusing to happily let the teacher bang them.

[–]Alienhunter糞大名 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I suspect it will escalate. Expect fake butt next. Followed by a sudden interest in nudism.

[–]LyingSpirit472 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Oh, of course it'll escalate if it doesn't work...but my point is, by doing the Mr. Garrison "I'm going to escalate this so far you'll have no choice but to fire me so I can sue the school district and never have to work again", it ignores that even when Mr. Garrison tried it, the result was finding out no matter how much this person escalates it, it's going to be seen as "StUnNiNg AnD BrAvE" and they'll be raised on a pedestal for doing it with anyone who complains being punished for daring disrespect them.

[–]ClassroomPast6178 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

[–]HiddenFox 10 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Video has gone private. Any alts?

[–]xoenix 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Can still be viewed embedded on their site.

[–]Adventurous_Ad6212 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

I swear this guy is absolutely trolling the entire world right now. Seeing how far they can push this to prove a point on how ridiculous society has become.

[–]ClassroomPast6178 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Are you going to do a big reveal?

[–]Adventurous_Ad6212 7 insightful - 5 fun7 insightful - 4 fun8 insightful - 5 fun -  (2 children)

I revealed myself once. And that's why I'm banned from public transit.

[–]jet199 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Fascists

[–]SneakyBishop 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

[–]Fusrodamus 6 insightful - 6 fun6 insightful - 5 fun7 insightful - 6 fun -  (0 children)

Of course that isn't Stephen Hanna. That's Kayla Lemieux, you filthy bigot! How dare you deadname her! Are you trying to murder her?

I don't believe it. Trans genocide playing out in real time, right here on Saidit.

[–]Datachost 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Reduxx have received a message from a student at the school (confirmed via student ID) who's saying it definitely is Stephen Hanna

[–]filbs111 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

You'd think this individual would get some flak from his own team. A bit like how you'd hope a teacher frogmarching to work with a square moustache to "own the libs" might be.

[–]nautilistic 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

His own team has no morality or boundaries.

[–]hfxB0oyADon't piss on my head & tell me it's raining. 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There's a video with this guy leaning over a chop saw with his bullshit wig dangling dangerously close to the blade. He'd better be careful with his skin suit, or public embarrassment will be the least of his worries.

[–]noseburp 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Mirror?

[–]QueenBread[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Oh wow, they were quick taking that video down eh? Can't go against the agenda....

[–]noseburp 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)