you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]fuck_redditThou/Thee/Thy 10 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

How do they know the authors didn’t do their “due diligence”?

[–]TaseAFeminist4Jesus 7 insightful - 5 fun7 insightful - 4 fun8 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

They must have firsthand knowledge of the authors' history of failure in properly vetting corporate mergers and acquisitions. I'm not sure why else they'd pick that (very niche) legal term. I wouldn't think they'd just use it as a fancy-sounding synonym for "duty" or "job." You'd have to be a real fucking loser to go around talking like that.

[–]LyingSpirit472 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Well, you see...it's not them, personally, therefore they are obviously evil.

[–]jet199 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

You find out by reading it and seeing if it's fucked up or accurate.

But the wokescolds want to stop people reading things by those they don't like and don't want get exposed to contrary opinions themselves so they can't do that.

They have to demand people list off their identities, credentials and, most importantly, victimhood.

Look at American Dirt, liked by pretty much everyone who bothered to read it but viciously hated by woke people who'd only read about it on social media because the author was the wrong type of person.