too smart to simply be a woman

submitted by Aerozine from i.imgur.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]clownworlddropout 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

There are differences between the sexes, these are valid and measurable. Let's not ignore that in some misguided sense of "fairness" or conflate it with all this genderwoo nonsense. You seem overeager to dismiss the fact that men and women are different both physically and mentally.

[–]Objecting_Sphere 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

No, it's the tranny in the picture who's overeager to believe that correlations in IQ say something important about gender. All I said is that the bell curves overlap and you can't say for sure. Just how well do you think you can infer someone's sex by their spatial IQ score? I'd guess maybe 70% accuracy. (haven't looked at the stats, just eyeballing) It's something but you can't work backward reliably. Unless your definition of reliable is 70%. I have a nearly 100% success rate using my eyes to tell me someone's sex...

[–]clownworlddropout 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'd guesstimate around 70% as well, which is more often than not, which is exactly what I said.