you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]CreditKnifeMan 11 insightful - 3 fun11 insightful - 2 fun12 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

Substitute "LGBT-P".

I don't believe TPTB ever truly supported the L, or G, or B.

They clearly support the T.

I suspect the Paedo "P" was their end game.
That's where the big money is in human trafficking.

The paedo group quietly financed the rest of it, as the thin edge of the wedge.

The other groups accepted financial/political support from wherever they found it, which is understandable.

The paedos know how to keep a low profile, but they're finally coming out of the shadows, and aggressively suppressing public opposition.

Hence the censorship.

Censorship is a ugly tool. It's heavy handed, and it's obvious who's behind it to those who are censored.

You can be certain you're over the target when they come for you, because the truth is forbidden (censorship, etc.).

They wanted to add the "P" to the LGBT for a long time.

Getting then to censor the "P" will work against their normalization plan.

Maybe add the P like: "LGBT P"

Put some distance between the rest of the group.

[–]ElectricSheep 7 insightful - 5 fun7 insightful - 4 fun8 insightful - 5 fun -  (1 child)

Let's just cut to the chase and use LGBP

[–]CreditKnifeMan 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

The social justice crusaders would sabotage that.

Ts aren't Ps. Some are, but not most.
The Ps hide behind other groups, so this could backfire.

Ps, are Ps. It's indefensible.
Nobody who isn't already P will support them, unless they can hide behind other groups.

This is why it's important to be clear with our use of language.

It's also the reason that the opposing groups are intentionally confusing the language.