DISCUSSIONIf homosexuality is genetic,where are the genetics for the other new sexualities?

submitted by jacques1102 from self.TumblrInAction

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]jacques1102[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I agree that those 3 are the only sexualities that make sense and are real.My point is with the new sexualities that the LGBT community is coming up with,from an evolutionary point, pansexuality and polysexuality makes 0 sense cause how would an organism evolve in such a way to be attracted to something that in itself is a social construct?

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I agree with you, I am referring to the people in this thread that claim that homosexuality is related to not having a father in the home, which is just blatantly untrue.

But yes, pansexuality and polysexuality are meaningless terms invented by the same kind of blue-haired mentally stunted fools you see on Tumblr. It's no longer cool to be spicy straight, now you gonna be spicy bi.